BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Meili Baragatti

Meili Baragatti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Likelihood-Free Parallel Tempering

Approximate Bayesian Computational (ABC) methods (or likelihood-free methods) have appeared in the past fifteen years as useful methods to perform Bayesian analyses when the likelihood is analytically or computationally intractable. Several ABC methods have been proposed: Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) methods have been developped by Marjoramet al. (2003) and by Bortotet al. (2007) for instance, and sequential methods have been proposed among others by Sissonet al. (2007), Beaumont et al. (2009) and Del Moral et al. (2009). Until now, while ABC-MCMC methods remain the reference, sequential ABC methods have appeared to outperforms them (see for example McKinley et al. (2009) or Sisson et al. (2007)). In this paper a new algorithm combining population-based MCMC methods with ABC requirements is proposed, using an analogy with the Parallel Tempering algorithm (Geyer, 1991). Performances are compared with existing ABC algorithms on simulations and on a real example.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Parallel Tempering with Equi-Energy Moves

The Equi-Energy Sampler (EES) introduced by Kou et al [2006] is based on a population of chains which are updated by local moves and global moves, also called equi-energy jumps. The state space is partitioned into energy rings, and the current state of a chain can jump to a past state of an adjacent chain that has energy level close to its level. This algorithm has been developed to facilitate global moves between different chains, resulting in a good exploration of the state space by the target chain. This method seems to be more efficient than the classical Parallel Tempering (PT) algorithm. However it is difficult to use in combination with a Gibbs sampler and it necessitates increased storage. In this paper we propose an adaptation of this EES that combines PT with the principle of swapping between chains with same levels of energy. This adaptation, that we shall call Parallel Tempering with Equi-Energy Moves (PTEEM), keeps the original idea of the EES method while ensuring good theoretical properties, and practical implementation even if combined with a Gibbs sampler. Performances of the PTEEM algorithm are compared with those of the EES and of the standard PT algorithms in the context of mixture models, and in a problem of identification of gene regulatory binding motifs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A study of variable selection using g-prior distribution with ridge parameter

In the Bayesian stochastic search variable selection framework, a common prior distribution for the regression coefficients is the g-prior of Zellner (1986). However, there are two standard cases in which the associated covariance matrix does not exist, and the conventional prior of Zellner can not be used: if the number of observations is lower than the number of variables (large p and small n paradigm), or if some variables are linear combinations of others. In such situations a prior distribution derived from the prior of Zellner can be used, by introducing a ridge parameter. This prior introduced by Gupta and Ibrahim (2007) is a flexible and simple adaptation of the g-prior. In this paper we study the influence of the ridge parameter on the selection of variables. A simple way to choose the associated hyper-parameters is proposed. The method is valid for any generalized linear mixed model and we focus on the case of probit mixed models when some variables are linear combinations of others. The method is applied to both simulated and real datasets obtained from Affymetrix microarray experiments. Results are compared to those obtained with the Bayesian Lasso.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Bayesian Variable Selection for Probit Mixed Models Applied to Gene Selection

In computational biology, gene expression datasets are characterized by very few individual samples compared to a large number of measurements per sample. Thus, it is appealing to merge these datasets in order to increase the number of observations and diversify the data, allowing a more reliable selection of genes relevant to the biological problem. Besides, the increased size of a merged dataset facilitates its re-splitting into training and validation sets. This necessitates the introduction of the dataset as a random effect. In this context, extending a work of Lee et al. (2003), a method is proposed to select relevant variables among tens of thousands in a probit mixed regression model, considered as part of a larger hierarchical Bayesian model. Latent variables are used to identify subsets of selected variables and the grouping (or blocking) technique of Liu (1994) is combined with a Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm (Robert and Casella 2004). The method is applied to a merged dataset made of three individual gene expression datasets, in which tens of thousands of measurements are available for each of several hundred human breast cancer samples. Even for this large dataset comprised of around 20000 predictors, the method is shown to be efficient and feasible. As an illustration, it is used to select the most important genes that characterize the estrogen receptor status of patients with breast cancer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access