BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Maxym Dudka

Maxym Dudka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.soft

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

From steady-state TASEP model with open boundaries to 1D Ising model at negative fugacity

We demonstrate here a series of exact mappings between particular cases of four statistical physics models: equilibrium 1-dimensional lattice gas with nearest-neighbor repulsion, $(1+1)$-dimensional combinatorial heap of pieces, random walks on half-plane and totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) in one dimension (1D). In particular, we show that generating function of a steady state of one-dimensional TASEP with open boundaries can be interpreted as a quotient of partition functions of 1D hard-core lattice gases with one adsorbing lattice site and negative fugacity. This result is based on the combination of (i) a representation of the steady-state TASEP configurations in terms of $(1+1)$-dimensional heaps of pieces and (ii) a theorem connecting the partition function of $(1+1)$-dimensional heaps of pieces with that of a single layer of pieces, which in this case is a 1D hard-core lattice gas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Equilibrium properties of two-species reactive lattice gases on random catalytic chains

We focus here on the thermodynamic properties of adsorbates formed by two-species $A+B \to \oslash$ reactions on a one-dimensional infinite lattice with heterogeneous "catalytic" properties. In our model hard-core $A$ and $B$ particles undergo continuous exchanges with their reservoirs and react when dissimilar species appear at neighboring lattice sites in presence of a "catalyst." The latter is modeled by supposing either that randomly chosen bonds in the lattice promote reactions (Model I) or that reactions are activated by randomly chosen lattice sites (Model II). In the case of annealed disorder in spatial distribution of a catalyst we calculate the pressure of the adsorbate by solving three-site (Model I) or four-site (Model II) recursions obeyed by the corresponding averaged grand-canonical partition functions. In the case of quenched disorder, we use two complementary approaches to find $\textit{exact}$ expressions for the pressure. The first approach is based on direct combinatorial arguments. In the second approach, we frame the model in terms of random matrices; the pressure is then represented as an averaged logarithm of the trace of a product of random $3 \times 3$ matrices -- either uncorrelated (Model I) or sequentially correlated (Model II).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Possibility of a continuous phase transition in random-anisotropy magnets with ageneric random-axis distribution

We reconsider the problem of the critical behavior of a three-dimensional $O(m)$ symmetric magnetic system in the presence of random anisotropy disorder with a generic trimodal random axis distribution. By introducing $n$ replicas to average over disorder it can be coarse-grained to a $ϕ^{4}$-theory with $m \times n$ component order parameter and five coupling constants taken in the limit of $n \to 0$. Using a field theory approach we renormalize the model to two-loop order and calculate the $β$-functions within the $\varepsilon$ expansion and directly in three dimensions. We analyze the corresponding renormalization group flows with the help of the Padé-Borel resummation technique. We show that there is no stable fixed point accessible from physical initial conditions whose existence was argued in the previous studies. This may indicate an absence of a long-range ordered phase in the presence of random anisotropy disorder with a generic random axis distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Superionic liquids in conducting nanoslits: A variety of phase transitions and ensuing charging behavior

We develop a theory of charge storage in ultra-narrow slit-like pores of nano\-structured electrodes. Our analysis is based on the Blume-Capel model in external field, which we solve analytically on a Bethe lattice. The obtained solutions allow us to explore the complete phase diagram of confined ionic liquids in terms of the key parameters characterising the system, such as pore ionophilicity, interionic interaction energy and voltage. The phase diagram includes the lines of first and second-order, direct and re-entrant, phase transitions, which are manifested by singularities in the corresponding capacitance-voltage plots. To test our predictions experimentally requires mono-disperse, conducting, ultra-narrow slit pores, permitting only one layer of ions, and thick pore walls, preventing interionic interactions across the pore walls. However, some qualitative features, which distinguish the behavior of ionophilic and ionophobic pores, and its underlying physics, may emerge in future experimental studies of more complex electrode structures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access