Source author record

Max Kanovich

Max Kanovich appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Logic in Computer Science math.LO Computation and Language Data Structures and Algorithms Programming Languages

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Language Models for Some Extensions of the Lambek Calculus

We investigate language interpretations of two extensions of the Lambek calculus: with additive conjunction and disjunction and with additive conjunction and the unit constant. For extensions with additive connectives, we show that conjunction and disjunction behave differently. Adding both of them leads to incompleteness due to the distributivity law. We show that with conjunction only no issues with distributivity arise. In contrast, there exists a corollary of the distributivity law in the language with disjunction only which is not derivable in the non-distributive system. Moreover, this difference keeps valid for systems with permutation and/or weakening structural rules, that is, intuitionistic linear and affine logics and affine multiplicative-additive Lambek calculus. For the extension of the Lambek with the unit constant, we present a calculus which reflects natural algebraic properties of the empty word. We do not claim completeness for this calculus, but we prove undecidability for the whole range of systems extending this minimal calculus and sound w.r.t. language models. As a corollary, we show that in the language with the unit there exissts a sequent that is true if all variables are interpreted by regular language, but not true in language models in general.

preprint2016arXiv

Biabduction (and Related Problems) in Array Separation Logic

We investigate array separation logic (ASL), a variant of symbolic-heap separation logic in which the data structures are either pointers or arrays, i.e., contiguous blocks of allocated memory. This logic provides a language for compositional memory safety proofs of imperative array programs. We focus on the biabduction problem for this logic, which has been established as the key to automatic specification inference at the industrial scale. We present an NP decision procedure for biabduction in ASL that produces solutions of reasonable quality, and we also show that the problem of finding a consistent solution is NP-hard. Along the way, we study satisfiability and entailment in our logic, giving decision procedures and complexity bounds for both problems. We show satisfiability to be NP-complete, and entailment to be decidable with high complexity. The somewhat surprising fact that biabduction is much simpler than entailment is explained by the fact that, as we show, the element of choice over biabduction solutions enables us to dramatically reduce the search space.

preprint2016arXiv

Undecidability of the Lambek calculus with a relevant modality

Morrill and Valentin in the paper "Computational coverage of TLG: Nonlinearity" considered an extension of the Lambek calculus enriched by a so-called "exponential" modality. This modality behaves in the "relevant" style, that is, it allows contraction and permutation, but not weakening. Morrill and Valentin stated an open problem whether this system is decidable. Here we show its undecidability. Our result remains valid if we consider the fragment where all division operations have one direction. We also show that the derivability problem in a restricted case, where the modality can be applied only to variables (primitive types), is decidable and belongs to the NP class.

preprint2015arXiv

Horn Linear Logic and Minsky Machines

Here we give a detailed proof for the crucial point in our Minsky machine simulation - that any linear logic derivation for a specific Horn sequent can be transformed into a Minsky computation leading from an initial configuration to the halting configuration. Among other things, the presentation advantage of the 3-step program is that the non-trivial tricky points are distributed between the independent parts each of which we justify following its own intrinsic methodology (to say nothing of the induction used in the opposite directions): (1) From LL to HLL - we use purely proof-theoretic arguments. (2) From HLL to Horn programs - we translate trees (HLL derivations) into another trees (Horn programs)of the same shape, almost. (3) From Horn programs to Minsky computations - we use purely computational arguments.