Researcher profile

Max Ehre

Max Ehre contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Certified Dimension Reduction for Bayesian Updating with the Cross-Entropy Method

In inverse problems, the parameters of a model are estimated based on observations of the model response. The Bayesian approach is powerful for solving such problems; one formulates a prior distribution for the parameter state that is updated with the observations to compute the posterior parameter distribution. Solving for the posterior distribution can be challenging when, e.g., prior and posterior significantly differ from one another and/or the parameter space is high-dimensional. We use a sequence of importance sampling measures that arise by tempering the likelihood to approach inverse problems exhibiting a significant distance between prior and posterior. Each importance sampling measure is identified by cross-entropy minimization as proposed in the context of Bayesian inverse problems in Engel et al. (2021). To efficiently address problems with high-dimensional parameter spaces we set up the minimization procedure in a low-dimensional subspace of the original parameter space. The principal idea is to analyse the spectrum of the second-moment matrix of the gradient of the log-likelihood function to identify a suitable subspace. Following Zahm et al. (2021), an upper bound on the Kullback-Leibler-divergence between full-dimensional and subspace posterior is provided, which can be utilized to determine the effective dimension of the inverse problem corresponding to a prescribed approximation error bound. We suggest heuristic criteria for optimally selecting the number of model and model gradient evaluations in each iteration of the importance sampling sequence. We investigate the performance of this approach using examples from engineering mechanics set in various parameter space dimensions.

preprint2022arXiv

Sequential active learning of low-dimensional model representations for reliability analysis

To date, the analysis of high-dimensional, computationally expensive engineering models remains a difficult challenge in risk and reliability engineering. We use a combination of dimensionality reduction and surrogate modelling termed partial least squares-driven polynomial chaos expansion (PLS-PCE) to render such problems feasible. Standalone surrogate models typically perform poorly for reliability analysis. Therefore, in a previous work, we have used PLS-PCEs to reconstruct the intermediate densities of a sequential importance sampling approach to reliability analysis. Here, we extend this approach with an active learning procedure that allows for improved error control at each importance sampling level. To this end, we formulate an estimate of the combined estimation error for both the subspace identified in the dimension reduction step and surrogate model constructed therein. With this, it is possible to adapt the design of experiments so as to optimally learn the subspace representation and the surrogate model constructed therein. The approach is gradient-free and thus can be directly applied to black box-type models. We demonstrate the performance of this approach with a series of low- (2 dimensions) to high- (869 dimensions) dimensional example problems featuring a number of well-known caveats for reliability methods besides high dimensions and expensive computational models: strongly nonlinear limit-state functions, multiple relevant failure regions and small probabilities of failure.