Researcher profile

Matthew R. Williams

Matthew R. Williams contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Private Tabular Survey Data Products through Synthetic Microdata Generation

We propose two synthetic microdata approaches to generate private tabular survey data products for public release. We adapt a pseudo posterior mechanism that downweights by-record likelihood contributions with weights $\in [0,1]$ based on their identification disclosure risks to producing tabular products for survey data. Our method applied to an observed survey database achieves an asymptotic global probabilistic differential privacy guarantee. Our two approaches synthesize the observed sample distribution of the outcome and survey weights, jointly, such that both quantities together possess a privacy guarantee. The privacy-protected outcome and survey weights are used to construct tabular cell estimates (where the cell inclusion indicators are treated as known and public) and associated standard errors to correct for survey sampling bias. Through a real data application to the Survey of Doctorate Recipients public use file and simulation studies motivated by the application, we demonstrate that our two microdata synthesis approaches to construct tabular products provide superior utility preservation as compared to the additive-noise approach of the Laplace Mechanism. Moreover, our approaches allow the release of microdata to the public, enabling additional analyses at no extra privacy cost.

preprint2022arXiv

Re-weighting of Vector-weighted Mechanisms for Utility Maximization under Differential Privacy

We address practical implementation of a risk-weighted pseudo posterior synthesizer for microdata dissemination with a new re-weighting strategy that maximizes utility of released synthetic data under at any level of formal privacy guarantee. Our re-weighting strategy applies to any vector-weighted pseudo posterior mechanism under which a vector of observation-indexed weights are used to downweight likelihood contributions for high disclosure risk records. We demonstrate our method on two different vector-weighted schemes that target high-risk records. Our new method for constructing record-indexed downeighting maximizes the data utility under any privacy budget for the vector-weighted synthesizers by adjusting the by-record weights, such that their individual Lipschitz bounds approach the bound for the entire database. Our method achieves an $(ε= 2 Δ_{\boldsymbolα})-$asymptotic differential privacy (aDP) guarantee, globally, over the space of databases. We illustrate our methods using simulated highly skewed count data and compare the results to a scalar-weighted synthesizer under the Exponential Mechanism (EM). We also apply our methods to a sample of the Survey of Doctorate Recipients and demonstrate the practicality of our methods.

preprint2021arXiv

Risk-Efficient Bayesian Data Synthesis for Privacy Protection

Statistical agencies utilize models to synthesize respondent-level data for release to the public for privacy protection. In this work, we efficiently induce privacy protection into any Bayesian synthesis model by employing a pseudo likelihood that exponentiates each likelihood contribution by an observation record-indexed weight in [0, 1], defined to be inversely proportional to the identification risk for that record. We start with the marginal probability of identification risk for a record, which is composed as the probability that the identity of the record may be disclosed. Our application to the Consumer Expenditure Surveys (CE) of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics demonstrates that the marginally risk-adjusted synthesizer provides an overall improved privacy protection; however, the identification risks actually increase for some moderate-risk records after risk-adjusted pseudo posterior estimation synthesis due to increased isolation after weighting; a phenomenon we label "whack-a-mole". We proceed to construct a weight for each record from a collection of pairwise identification risk probabilities with other records, where each pairwise probability measures the joint probability of re-identification of the pair of records, which mitigates the whack-a-mole issue and produces a more efficient set of synthetic data with lower risk and higher utility for the CE data.

preprint2019arXiv

Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation Under Complex Sampling

Social and economic studies are often implemented as complex survey designs. For example, multistage, unequal probability sampling designs utilized by federal statistical agencies are typically constructed to maximize the efficiency of the target domain level estimator (e.g., indexed by geographic area) within cost constraints for survey administration. Such designs may induce dependence between the sampled units; for example, with employment of a sampling step that selects geographically-indexed clusters of units. A sampling-weighted pseudo-posterior distribution may be used to estimate the population model on the observed sample. The dependence induced between co-clustered units inflates the scale of the resulting pseudo-posterior covariance matrix that has been shown to induce under coverage of the credibility sets. By bridging results across Bayesian model mispecification and survey sampling, we demonstrate that the scale and shape of the asymptotic distributions are different between each of the pseudo-MLE, the pseudo-posterior and the MLE under simple random sampling. Through insights from survey sampling variance estimation and recent advances in computational methods, we devise a correction applied as a simple and fast post-processing step to MCMC draws of the pseudo-posterior distribution. This adjustment projects the pseudo-posterior covariance matrix such that the nominal coverage is approximately achieved. We make an application to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health as a motivating example and we demonstrate the efficacy of our scale and shape projection procedure on synthetic data on several common archetypes of survey designs.