Researcher profile

Matthew Baker

Matthew Baker contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A modern perspective on Tutte's homotopy theorem

We begin with a review of Tutte's homotopy theory, which concerns the structure of certain graph associated to a matroid (together with some extra data). Concretely, Tutte's path theorem asserts that this graph is connected, and his homotopy theorem asserts that every cycle in the graph is a composition of ''elementary cycles'', which come in four different flavors. We present an extended version of the homotopy theorem, in which we give a more refined classification of the different types of elementary cycles. We explain in detail how the path theorem allows one to prove that the foundation of a matroid (in the sense of Baker--Lorscheid) is generated by universal cross-ratios, and how the extended homotopy theorem allows one to classify all algebraic relations between universal cross-ratios. The resulting ''fundamental presentation'' of the foundation was previously established in [Baker--Lorscheid], but the argument here is more self-contained. We then recall a few applications of the fundamental presentation to the representation theory of matroids. Finally, in the most novel but also the most speculative part of the paper, we discuss what a ''higher Tutte homotopy theorem'' might look like, and we present some preliminary computations along these lines.

preprint2023arXiv

Representability of orthogonal matroids over partial fields

Let $r \leqslant n$ be nonnegative integers, and let $N = \binom{n}{r} - 1$. For a matroid $M$ of rank $r$ on the finite set $E = [n]$ and a partial field $k$ in the sense of Semple--Whittle, it is known that the following are equivalent: (a) $M$ is representable over $k$; (b) there is a point $p = (p_J) \in {\bf P}^N(k)$ with support $M$ (meaning that $\text{Supp}(p) := \{J \in \binom{E}{r} \; \vert \; p_J \ne 0\}$ of $p$ is the set of bases of $M$) satisfying the Grassmann-Plücker equations; and (c) there is a point $p = (p_J) \in {\bf P}^N(k)$ with support $M$ satisfying just the 3-term Grassmann-Plücker equations. Moreover, by a theorem of P. Nelson, almost all matroids (meaning asymptotically 100%) are not representable over any partial field. We prove analogues of these facts for Lagrangian orthogonal matroids in the sense of Gelfand-Serganova, which are equivalent to even Delta-matroids in the sense of Bouchet.

preprint2020arXiv

Foundations of matroids I: Matroids without large uniform minors

The foundation of a matroid is a canonical algebraic invariant which classifies representations of the matroid up to rescaling equivalence. Foundations of matroids are pastures, a simultaneous generalization of partial fields and hyperfields. Using deep results due to Tutte, Dress-Wenzel, and Gelfand-Rybnikov-Stone, we give a presentation for the foundation of a matroid in terms of generators and relations. The generators are certain "cross-ratios" generalizing the cross-ratio of four points on a projective line, and the relations encode dependencies between cross-ratios in certain low-rank configurations arising in projective geometry. Although the presentation of the foundation is valid for all matroids, it is simplest to apply in the case of matroids without large uniform minors, i.e. matroids having no minor corresponding to five points on a line or its dual configuration. For such matroids, we obtain a complete classification of all possible foundations. We then give a number of applications of this classification theorem, for example: - We prove the following strengthening of a theorem of Lee and Scobee: every orientation of a matroid without large uniform minors comes from a dyadic representation, which is unique up to rescaling. - For a matroid $M$ without large uniform minors, we establish the following strengthening of a 2017 theorem of Ardila-Rincón-Williams: if $M$ is positively oriented then $M$ is representable over every field with at least three elements. - Two matroids are said to belong to the same representation class if they are representable over precisely the same pastures. We prove that there are precisely 12 possibilities for the representation class of a matroid without large uniform minors, exactly three of which are not representable over any field.