Source author record

Matt Giles

Matt Giles appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

A preliminary study on a multi-resolution-level inverse planning algorithm for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Manual forward planning for GK radiosurgery is complicated and time-consuming, particularly for cases with large or irregularly shaped targets. Inverse planning eases GK planning by solving an optimization problem. However, due to the vast search space, most inverse planning algorithms have to decouple the planning process to isocenter preselection and sector duration optimization. This sequential scheme does not necessarily lead to optimal isocenter locations and hence optimal plans. In this study, we attempt to optimize the isocenter positions, beam shapes and durations simultaneously by proposing a multi-resolution-level (MRL) strategy to handle the large-scale GK optimization problem. In our approach, several rounds of optimizations were performed with a progressively increased spatial resolution for isocenter candidate selection. The isocenters selected from last round and their neighbors on a finer resolution were used as new isocenter candidates for next round of optimization. After plan optimization, shot sequencing was performed to group the optimized sectors to deliverable shots supported by GK treatment units. We have tested our algorithm on 6 GK cases previously treated in our institution (2 meningioma cases, 3 cases with single metastasis and 1 case with 6 metastases). Compared with manual planning, achieving same coverage and similar selectivity, our algorithm improved the gradient index averagely from 3.1 to 2.9 and reduced the maximum dose of brainstem from 8.0Gy to 5.6Gy. The average beam-on time was also reduced by from 103.8 mins to 87.4 mins. Our method was also compared with the inverse planning algorithm provided in Leksell GammaPlan planning system, and outperformed it with better plan quality for all the 6 cases.This preliminary study has demonstrated the effectiveness and feasibility of our MRL inverse planning approach for GK radiosurgery.