BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mathias Malandain

Mathias Malandain contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Programming Languageseess.SYSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Structural Methods for handling mode changes in multimode DAE systems

Hybrid systems are an important concept in Cyber-Physical Systems modeling, for which multiphysics modeling from first principles and the reuse of models from libraries are key. To achieve this, DAEs must be used to specify the dynamics in each discrete state (or mode in our context). This led to the development of DAE-based equational languages supporting multiple modes, of which Modelica is a popular standard. Mode switching can be time- or state-based. Impulsive behaviors can occur at mode changes. While mode changes are well understood in particular physics (e.g., contact mechanics), this is not the case in physics-agnostic paradigms such as Modelica. This situation causes difficulties for the compilation of programs, often requiring users to manually smooth out mode changes. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the hot restart at mode changes in such paradigms. We propose a mathematical meaning for hot restarts (such a mathematical meaning does not exist in general), as well as a combined structural and impulse analysis for mode changes, generating the hot restart even in the presence of impulses. Our algorithm detects at compile time if the mode change is insufficiently specified, in which case it returns diagnostics information to the user.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Structural Analysis of Multimode DAE Systems: summary of results

Modern modeling languages for general physical systems, such as Modelica, Amesim, or Simscape, rely on Differential Algebraic Equations (DAEs), i.e., constraints of the form f(\dot{x},x,u)=0. This drastically facilitates modeling from first principles of the physics, as well as model reuse. In recent works [RR-9334], we presented the mathematical theory needed to establish the development of compilers and tools for DAE-based physical modeling languages on solid mathematical grounds.At the core of this analysis sits the so-called *structural analysis*, whose purpose, at compile time, is to either identify under- and over-specified subsystems (if any), or to rewrite the model in a form amenable of existing DAE solvers, including the handling of mode change events. The notion of "structure" collects, for each mode and mode change event, the variables and equations involved, as well as the *latent equations* (additional equations redundant with the system), needed to prepare the code submitted to the solver. The notion of DAE *index* (the minimal number of times any equation has to be possibly differentiated) is part of this structural analysis. This report complements [RR-9334] by collecting all the needed background on structural analysis. The body of knowledge on structural analysis is large and scattered, which also motivated us to collect it in a single report.We first explain the primary meaning of structural analysis of systems of equations, namely the study of their regularity or singularity in some generic sense. We then briefly review the body of graph theory used in this context. We develop some extensions, for which we are not aware of any reference, namely the structural analysis of systems of equations with existential quantifiers. For the structural analysis of DAE systems, we focus on John Pryce's Sigma-method, that we both summarize and extend to non-square systems. The uses of these tools and methods in [RR9334] are highlighted in this report.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Mathematical Foundations of Physical Systems Modeling Languages

Modern modeling languages for general physical systems, such as Modelica, Amesim, or Simscape, rely on Differential Algebraic Equations (DAE), i.e., constraints of the form f(dot{x},x,u)=0. This drastically facilitates modeling from first principles of the physics and the reuse of models. In this paper we develop the mathematical theory needed to establish the development of compilers and tools for DAE based physical modeling languages on solid mathematical bases. Unlike Ordinary Differential Equations, DAE exhibit subtle issues because of the notion of differentiation index and related latent equations -- ODE are DAE of index zero for which no latent equation needs to be considered. Prior to generating execution code and calling solvers, the compilation of such languages requires a nontrivial \emph{structural analysis} step that reduces the differentiation index to a level acceptable by DAE solvers. The models supported by tools of the Modelica class involve multiple modes with mode-dependent DAE based dynamics and state-dependent mode switching. Multimode DAE are much more difficult than DAE. The main difficulty is the handling of the events of mode change. Unfortunately, the large literature devoted to the mathematical analysis of DAEs does not cover the multimode case, typically saying nothing about mode changes. This lack of foundations causes numerous difficulties to the existing modeling tools. Some models are well handled, others are not, with no clear boundary between the two classes. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive mathematical approach supporting compilation and code generation for this class of languages. Its core is the structural analysis of multimode DAE systems. As a byproduct of this structural analysis, we propose well sound criteria for accepting or rejecting models. For our mathematical development, we rely on nonstandard analysis, which allows us to cast hybrid systems dynamics to discrete time dynamics with infinitesimal step size, thus providing a uniform framework for handling both continuous dynamics and mode change events.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access