BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mathias Göken

Mathias Göken contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Structural reorientation and compaction of porous MoS2 coatings during wear testing

Industrial upscaling frequently results in a different coating microstructure than the laboratory prototypes presented in the literature. Here, we investigate the wear behavior of physical vapor deposited (PVD) MoS2 coatings: A dense, nanocrystalline MoS2 coating, and a porous, prismatic-textured MoS2 coating. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations before and after wear testing evidence a crystallographic reorientation towards a basal texture in both samples. A basal texture is usually desirable due to its low-friction properties. This favorable reorientation is associated to a tribological compaction of the porous specimens. Following running-in, sliding under high contact pressure ultimately leads to a wear rate as small as for an ideal grown bulk MoS2 single crystal grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). This suggests that the imperfections of industrial grade MoS2 coatings can be remediated by a suitable pretreatment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

On the influence of Al-concentration on the fracture toughness of NiAl: microcantilever fracture tests and atomistic simulations

The mechanical properties of the stoichiometric B2 $β$-phase of NiAl are well established, however the effect of off-stoichiometric composition on the fracture toughness has not yet been systematically studied over the entire composition range of 40-50% Al. Here we use microbending tests on notched cantilever beams FIB-milled from NiAl single crystals with an aluminized as well as an oxidation-induced composition gradient to determine the influence of the Al concentration on the mechanical properties. The fracture toughness is maximal for the stoichiometric composition. It decreases with increasing Ni-content in the Ni-rich composition range, where plastic deformation is observed to accompany the fracture process. In contrast, no plasticity is observed in Al-rich NiAl, which shows a nearly concentration-independent, low fracture toughness. The theoretical fracture toughness according to Griffith, however, shows only a very weak composition dependence in both, the Ni- and Al-rich composition range. The differences in fracture toughness could furthermore not be explained solely based on the different hardening contributions of Ni-antisites in the Ni-rich and structural vacancies in the Al-rich crystals. Atomistic fracture simulations show that crack propagation in NiAl takes place by the nucleation and migration of kinks on the crack front. The low fracture toughness of Al-rich NiAl can thus be understood by the dual effect of structural vacancies as strong obstacles to dislocation motion and as source of crack front kinks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access