Source author record

Massimo Lauria

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
5topics
4close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2023arXiv

Verification and generation of unrefinable partitions

Unrefinable partitions are a subset of partitions into distinct parts which satisfy an additional unrefinability property. More precisely, being an unrefinable partition means that none of the parts can be written as the sum of smaller integers without introducing a repetition. We address the algorithmic aspects of unrefinable partitions, such as testing whether a given partition is unrefinable or not and enumerating all the partitions whose sum is a given integer. We design two algorithms to solve the two mentioned problems and we discuss their complexity.

preprint2022arXiv

On the maximal part in unrefinable partitions of triangular numbers

A partition into distinct parts is refinable if one of its parts aa can be replaced by two different integers which do not belong to the partition and whose sum is aa, and it is unrefinable otherwise. Clearly, the condition of being unrefinable imposes on the partition a non-trivial limitation on the size of the largest part and on the possible distributions of the parts. We prove a O(n1/2)O(n^{1/2})-upper bound for the largest part in an unrefinable partition of nn, and we call maximal those which reach the bound. We show a complete classification of maximal unrefinable partitions for triangular numbers, proving that if nn is even there exists only one maximal unrefinable partition of n(n+1)/2n(n+1)/2, and that if nn is odd the number of such partitions equals the number of partitions of ⌈n/2⌉\lceil n/2\rceil into distinct parts. In the second case, an explicit bijection is provided.

preprint2015arXiv

Tight Size-Degree Bounds for Sums-of-Squares Proofs

We exhibit families of 44-CNF formulas over nn variables that have sums-of-squares (SOS) proofs of unsatisfiability of degree (a.k.a. rank) dd but require SOS proofs of size nΩ(d)n^{Ω(d)} for values of d=d(n)d = d(n) from constant all the way up to nδn^δ for some universal constantδδ. This shows that the nO(d)n^{O(d)} running time obtained by using the Lasserre semidefinite programming relaxations to find degree-dd SOS proofs is optimal up to constant factors in the exponent. We establish this result by combining NP\mathsf{NP}-reductions expressible as low-degree SOS derivations with the idea of relativizing CNF formulas in [Krajíček '04] and [Dantchev and Riis'03], and then applying a restriction argument as in [Atserias, Müller, and Oliva '13] and [Atserias, Lauria, and Nordström '14]. This yields a generic method of amplifying SOS degree lower bounds to size lower bounds, and also generalizes the approach in [ALN14] to obtain size lower bounds for the proof systems resolution, polynomial calculus, and Sherali-Adams from lower bounds on width, degree, and rank, respectively.

preprint2014arXiv

From Small Space to Small Width in Resolution

In 2003, Atserias and Dalmau resolved a major open question about the resolution proof system by establishing that the space complexity of CNF formulas is always an upper bound on the width needed to refute them. Their proof is beautiful but somewhat mysterious in that it relies heavily on tools from finite model theory. We give an alternative, completely elementary proof that works by simple syntactic manipulations of resolution refutations. As a by-product, we develop a "black-box" technique for proving space lower bounds via a "static" complexity measure that works against any resolution refutation---previous techniques have been inherently adaptive. We conclude by showing that the related question for polynomial calculus (i.e., whether space is an upper bound on degree) seems unlikely to be resolvable by similar methods.

preprint2014arXiv

Narrow Proofs May Be Maximally Long

We prove that there are 3-CNF formulas over n variables that can be refuted in resolution in width w but require resolution proofs of size n^Omega(w). This shows that the simple counting argument that any formula refutable in width w must have a proof in size n^O(w) is essentially tight. Moreover, our lower bound generalizes to polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) and Sherali-Adams, implying that the corresponding size upper bounds in terms of degree and rank are tight as well. Our results do not extend all the way to Lasserre, however, where the formulas we study have proofs of constant rank and size polynomial in both n and w.

preprint2013arXiv

Short Res∗(polylog)\mathsf{Res}^*(\mathsf{polylog}) refutations if and only if narrow Res\mathsf{Res} refutations

In this note we show that any kk-CNF which can be refuted by a quasi-polynomial Res∗(polylog)\mathsf{Res}^*(\mathsf{polylog}) refutation has a "narrow" refutation in Res\mathsf{Res} (i.e., of poly-logarithmic width). We also show the converse implication: a narrow Resolution refutation can be simulated by a short Res∗(polylog)\mathsf{Res}^*(\mathsf{polylog}) refutation. The author does not claim priority on this result. The technical part of this note bears similarity with the relation between dd-depth Frege refutations and tree-like d+1d+1-depth Frege refutations outlined in (Krajíček 1994, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 73). Part of it had already been specialized to Res\mathsf{Res} and Res(k)\mathsf{Res}(k) in (Esteban et al. 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci. 321, 347).

preprint2013arXiv

The complexity of proving that a graph is Ramsey

We say that a graph with nn vertices is cc-Ramsey if it does not contain either a clique or an independent set of size clog⁡nc \log n. We define a CNF formula which expresses this property for a graph GG. We show a superpolynomial lower bound on the length of resolution proofs that GG is cc-Ramsey, for every graph GG. Our proof makes use of the fact that every Ramsey graph must contain a large subgraph with some of the statistical properties of the random graph.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.