Source author record

Masaru Doi

Masaru Doi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2009arXiv

New Parameterization in Muon Decay and the Type of Emitted Neutrino. II

In a previous paper, new sets of parameters to replace the Michel parameters were proposed to analyze data for the muon decay $μ^{+} \to e^{+}ν_{e}\bar{ν_μ}$. Both $(V-A)$ and $(V+A)$ charged currents with finite neutrino mass have been used to study this decay. In the present paper, this parameterization is extended to a more general form, and a method for data analysis (least squares) is discussed for the propose of determining the rate of contribution from the $(V+A)$ current. We find that there is a simple form in which the set of parameters is related primitively to the physical quantities. It is shown that the Michel parameters are one of the other sets that are obtained from this simple form by rearranging one term. We derive the condition to obtain the same information regarding unknown physical quantities in the case that the data are analyzed using these simple and rearranged forms separately. We find that there is some possibility to get different results from these analyses, because the equivalent condition is very delicate and the QED radiative corrections should be treated carefully. We propose a consistent formula for data analysis. It is useful to compare the value obtained in the least squares fit using the simple form with that obtained using the prediction of the standard model, because a large difference is not expected, especially in the case of the Majorana neutrino. Finally, we point out that the method we proposed to determine the type of neutrino in the previous paper is incorrect.