BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Masao Oi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this paper, we compute the Hecke action of a certain test function on the space of an unramified principal series of a connected reductive group over a non-archimedean local field by using the theory of Iwahori--Hecke algebra. As an application, we obtain a new expression of the local L-functions of unramified representations.
In this paper, we establish the theory of local newforms for irreducible tempered generic representations of unramified odd unitary groups over a non-archimedean local field. For the proof, we prove an analogue of the fundamental lemma for our compact groups.
We consider the symplectic group $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}$ defined over a $p$-adic field $F$, where $p=2$. We prove that every simple supercuspidal representation (in the sense of Gross--Reeder) of $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(F)$ corresponds to an irreducible $L$-parameter under the local Langlands correspondence for $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}$ established by Arthur.
In this paper, we prove the coincidence of Kaletha's recent construction of the local Langlands correspondence for regular supercuspidal representations with Harris--Taylor's one in the case of general linear groups. The keys are Bushnell--Henniart's essentially tame local Langlands correspondence and Tam's result on Bushnell--Henniart's rectifiers. By combining them, our problem is reduced to an elementary root-theoretic computation on the difference between Kaletha's and Tam's $χ$-data.