Source author record

Martin Suderland

Martin Suderland appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Distance bounds for high dimensional consistent digital rays and 2-D partially-consistent digital rays

We consider the problem of digitalizing Euclidean segments. Specifically, we look for a constructive method to connect any two points in $\mathbb{Z}^d$. The construction must be {\em consistent} (that is, satisfy the natural extension of the Euclidean axioms) while resembling them as much as possible. Previous work has shown asymptotically tight results in two dimensions with $Θ(\log N)$ error, where resemblance between segments is measured with the Hausdorff distance, and $N$ is the $L_1$ distance between the two points. This construction was considered tight because of a $Ω(\log N)$ lower bound that applies to any consistent construction in $\mathbb{Z}^2$. In this paper we observe that the lower bound does not directly extend to higher dimensions. We give an alternative argument showing that any consistent construction in $d$ dimensions must have $Ω(\log^{1/(d-1)} N)$ error. We tie the error of a consistent construction in high dimensions to the error of similar {\em weak} constructions in two dimensions (constructions for which some points need not satisfy all the axioms). This not only opens the possibility for having constructions with $o(\log N)$ error in high dimensions, but also opens up an interesting line of research in the tradeoff between the number of axiom violations and the error of the construction. In order to show our lower bound, we also consider a colored variation of the concept of discrepancy of a set of points that we find of independent interest.