BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Martin P. Neuenhofen

Martin P. Neuenhofen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Direct Method for Solving Integral Penalty Transcriptions of Optimal Control Problems

We present a numerical method for the minimization of objectives that are augmented with large quadratic penalties of overdetermined inconsistent equality constraints. Such objectives arise from quadratic integral penalty methods for the direct transcription of equality constrained optimal control problems. The Augmented Lagrangian Method (ALM) has a number of advantages over the Quadratic Penalty Method (QPM) for solving this class of problems. However, if the equality constraints of the discretization are inconsistent, then ALM might not converge to a point that minimizes the unconstrained bias of the objective and penalty term. Therefore, in this paper we explore a modification of ALM that fits our purpose. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the modified ALM can minimize certain quadratic penalty-augmented functions faster than QPM, whereas the unmodified ALM converges to a minimizer of a significantly different problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Integral Penalty-Barrier Direct Transcription Method for Optimal Control

Some direct transcription methods can fail to converge, e.g. when there are singular arcs. We recently introduced a convergent direct transcription method for optimal control problems, called the penalty-barrier finite element method (PBF). PBF converges under very weak assumptions on the problem instance. PBF avoids the ringing between collocation points, for example, by avoiding collocation entirely. Instead, equality path constraint residuals are forced to zero everywhere by an integral quadratic penalty term. We highlight conceptual differences between collocation- and penalty-type direct transcription methods. Theoretical convergence results for both types of methods are reviewed and compared. Formulas for implementing PBF are presented, with details on the formulation as a nonlinear program (NLP), sparsity and solution. Numerical experiments compare PBF against several collocation methods with regard to robustness, accuracy, sparsity and computational cost. We show that the computational cost, sparsity and construction of the NLP functions are roughly the same as for orthogonal collocation methods of the same degree and mesh. As an advantage, PBF converges in cases where collocation methods fail. PBF also allows one to trade off computational cost, optimality and violation of differential and other equality equations against each other.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access