Researcher profile

Marshall H. Cohen

Marshall H. Cohen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

180$^\circ$ Rotations in the Polarization Angle for Blazars

Rotations of the electric vector position angle (EVPA) in blazars are often close to an integral multiple of 180$^\circ$. There are multiple examples of this in the literature, and our analysis here, of the optical polarization data from the RoboPol monitoring program, strengthens the evidence by showing that $nπ$ rotations occur more frequently than expected by chance. We explain this with a model consisting of two polarized emission components: a "jet" that is constant in time, and a "burst" that is variable. The EVPA of the combination is $\rm EVPA_{jet}$ at both the beginning and the end of the burst, so the net rotation across the burst must be $nπ$. Examples are analyzed on the Stokes plane, where the winding number for the Stokes vector of the combination gives the value of $n$. The main conclusion is that the EVPA rotation can be much larger than the physical rotation of the emission region around the axis of the jet, but this requires the EVPAs of the jet and the burst to be nearly orthogonal. A shock-in-jet calculation by Zhang et al. can provide a physical model for our toy model, and in addition automatically gives the needed orthogonality. The model is illustrated with data on OJ287 published by Myserlis et al., and we suggest that the large rapid EVPA rotation seen there might be a phase effect and not representative of a physical rotation.