BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Markus Chimani

Markus Chimani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COComputational ComplexityComputational Geometry

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Star-Struck by Fixed Embeddings: Modern Crossing Number Heuristics

We present a thorough experimental evaluation of several crossing minimization heuristics that are based on the construction and iterative improvement of a planarization, i.e., a planar representation of a graph with crossings replaced by dummy vertices. The evaluated heuristics include variations and combinations of the well-known planarization method, the recently implemented star reinsertion method, and a new approach proposed herein: the mixed insertion method. Our experiments reveal the importance of several implementation details such as the detection of non-simple crossings (i.e., crossings between adjacent edges or multiple crossings between the same two edges). The most notable finding, however, is that the insertion of stars in a fixed embedding setting is not only significantly faster than the insertion of edges in a variable embedding setting, but also leads to solutions of higher quality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Crossing Numbers and Stress of Random Graphs

Consider a random geometric graph over a random point process in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Two points are connected by an edge if and only if their distance is bounded by a prescribed distance parameter. We show that projecting the graph onto a two dimensional plane is expected to yield a constant-factor crossing number (and rectilinear crossing number) approximation. We also show that the crossing number is positively correlated to the stress of the graph's projection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maximum Cut Parameterized by Crossing Number

Given an edge-weighted graph $G$ on $n$ nodes, the NP-hard Max-Cut problem asks for a node bipartition such that the sum of edge weights joining the different partitions is maximized. We propose a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by the number $k$ of crossings in a given drawing of $G$. Our algorithm achieves a running time of $O(2^k \cdot p(n + k))$, where $p$ is the polynomial running time for planar Max-Cut. The only previously known similar algorithm [8] is restricted to 1-planar graphs (i.e., at most one crossing per edge) and its dependency on $k$ is of order $3^k$ . A direct consequence of our result is that Max-Cut is fixed-parameter tractable w.r.t. the crossing number, even without a given drawing. Moreover, the results naturally carry over to the minor crossing number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A Note on the Practicality of Maximal Planar Subgraph Algorithms

Given a graph $G$, the NP-hard Maximum Planar Subgraph problem (MPS) asks for a planar subgraph of $G$ with the maximum number of edges. There are several heuristic, approximative, and exact algorithms to tackle the problem, but---to the best of our knowledge---they have never been compared competitively in practice. We report on an exploratory study on the relative merits of the diverse approaches, focusing on practical runtime, solution quality, and implementation complexity. Surprisingly, a seemingly only theoretically strong approximation forms the building block of the strongest choice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Tighter Insertion-based Approximation of the Crossing Number

Let G be a planar graph and F a set of additional edges not yet in G. The multiple edge insertion problem (MEI) asks for a drawing of G+F with the minimum number of pairwise edge crossings, such that the subdrawing of G is plane. Finding an exact solution to MEI is NP-hard for general F. We present the first polynomial time algorithm for MEI that achieves an additive approximation guarantee -- depending only on the size of F and the maximum degree of G, in the case of connected G. Our algorithm seems to be the first directly implementable one in that realm, too, next to the single edge insertion. It is also known that an (even approximate) solution to the MEI problem would approximate the crossing number of the F-almost-planar graph G+F, while computing the crossing number of G+F exactly is NP-hard already when |F|=1. Hence our algorithm induces new, improved approximation bounds for the crossing number problem of F-almost-planar graphs, achieving constant-factor approximation for the large class of such graphs of bounded degrees and bounded size of F.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Inserting Multiple Edges into a Planar Graph

Let $G$ be a connected planar (but not yet embedded) graph and $F$ a set of additional edges not yet in $G$. The {multiple edge insertion} problem (MEI) asks for a drawing of $G+F$ with the minimum number of pairwise edge crossings, such that the subdrawing of $G$ is plane. An optimal solution to this problem approximates the crossing number of the graph $G+F$. Finding an exact solution to MEI is NP-hard for general $F$, but linear time solvable for the special case of $|F|=1$ (SODA01, Algorithmica) or when all of $F$ are incident to a new vertex (SODA09). The complexity for general $F$ but with constant $k=|F|$ was open, but algorithms both with relative and absolute approximation guarantees have been presented (SODA11, ICALP11). We show that the problem is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) in $k$ for biconnected $G$, or if the cut vertices of $G$ have degrees bounded by a constant. We give the first exact algorithm for this problem; it requires only $O(|V(G)|)$ time for any constant $k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Strong Steiner Tree Approximations in Practice

In this experimental study we consider Steiner tree approximations that guarantee a constant approximation of ratio smaller than $2$. The considered greedy algorithms and approaches based on linear programming involve the incorporation of $k$-restricted full components for some $k \geq 3$. For most of the algorithms, their strongest theoretical approximation bounds are only achieved for $k \to \infty$. However, the running time is also exponentially dependent on $k$, so only small $k$ are tractable in practice. We investigate different implementation aspects and parameter choices that finally allow us to construct algorithms (somewhat) feasible for practical use. We compare the algorithms against each other, to an exact LP-based algorithm, and to fast and simple $2$-approximations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Network Design Problems with Bounded Distances via Shallow-Light Steiner Trees

In a directed graph $G$ with non-correlated edge lengths and costs, the \emph{network design problem with bounded distances} asks for a cost-minimal spanning subgraph subject to a length bound for all node pairs. We give a bi-criteria $(2+\varepsilon,O(n^{0.5+\varepsilon}))$-approximation for this problem. This improves on the currently best known linear approximation bound, at the cost of violating the distance bound by a factor of at most~$2+\varepsilon$. In the course of proving this result, the related problem of \emph{directed shallow-light Steiner trees} arises as a subproblem. In the context of directed graphs, approximations to this problem have been elusive. We present the first non-trivial result by proposing a $(1+\varepsilon,O(|R|^{\varepsilon}))$-ap\-proxi\-ma\-tion, where $R$ are the terminals. Finally, we show how to apply our results to obtain an $(α+\varepsilon,O(n^{0.5+\varepsilon}))$-approximation for \emph{light-weight directed $α$-spanners}. For this, no non-trivial approximation algorithm has been known before. All running times depends on $n$ and $\varepsilon$ and are polynomial in $n$ for any fixed $\varepsilon>0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

How Not to Characterize Planar-emulable Graphs

We investigate the question of which graphs have planar emulators (a locally-surjective homomorphism from some finite planar graph) -- a problem raised already in Fellows' thesis (1985) and conceptually related to the better known planar cover conjecture by Negami (1986). For over two decades, the planar emulator problem lived poorly in a shadow of Negami's conjecture--which is still open--as the two were considered equivalent. But, in the end of 2008, a surprising construction by Rieck and Yamashita falsified the natural "planar emulator conjecture", and thus opened a whole new research field. We present further results and constructions which show how far the planar-emulability concept is from planar-coverability, and that the traditional idea of likening it to projective embeddability is actually very out-of-place. We also present several positive partial characterizations of planar-emulable graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Minor crossing number is additive over arbitrary cuts

We prove that if $G$ is a graph with an minimal edge cut $F$ of size three and $G_1$, $G_2$ are the two (augmented) components of $G-F$, then the crossing number of $G$ is equal to the sum of crossing numbers of $G_1$ and $G_2$. Combining with known results, this implies that crossing number is additive over edge-cuts of size $d$ for $d\in\{0, 1, 2, 3\}$, whereas there are counterexamples for every $d\ge 4$. The techniques generalize to show that minor crossing number is additive over edge cuts of arbitrary size, as well as to provide bounds for crossing number additivity in arbitrary surfaces. We point out several applications to exact crossing number computation and crossing critical graphs, as well as provide a very general lower bound for the minor crossing number of the Cartesian product of an arbitrary graph with a tree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access