Source author record

Marko Aunedi

Marko Aunedi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

eess.SY Systems and Control physics.soc-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Multi-model assessment of heat decarbonisation options in the UK using electricity and hydrogen

Delivering low-carbon heat will require the substitution of natural gas with low-carbon alternatives such as electricity and hydrogen. The objective of this paper is to develop a method to soft-link two advanced, investment-optimising energy system models, RTN (Resource-Technology Network) and WeSIM (Whole-electricity System Investment Model), in order to assess cost-efficient heat decarbonisation pathways for the UK while utilising the respective strengths of the two models. The linking procedure included passing on hourly electricity prices from WeSIM as input to RTN, and returning capacities and locations of hydrogen generation and shares of electricity and hydrogen in heat supply from RTN to WeSIM. The outputs demonstrate that soft-linking can improve the quality of the solution, while providing useful insights into the cost-efficient pathways for zero-carbon heating. Quantitative results point to the cost-effectiveness of using a mix of electricity and hydrogen technologies for delivering zero-carbon heat, also demonstrating a high level of interaction between electricity and hydrogen infrastructure in a zero-carbon system. Hydrogen from gas reforming with carbon capture and storage can play a significant role in the medium term, while remaining a cost-efficient option for supplying peak heat demand in the longer term, with the bulk of heat demand being supplied by electric heat pumps.

preprint2022arXiv

Value of Fleet Vehicle Grid in Providing Transmission System Operator Services

In this paper a new aggregated model for electric vehicle (EV) fleets is presented that considers their daily and weekly usage patterns. A frequency-constrained stochastic unit commitment model is employed to optimally schedule EV charging and discharging as well as the provision of frequency response (FR) in an electricity system, while respecting the vehicles' energy requirements and driving schedules. Through case studies we demonstrate that an EV with vehicle to grid (V2G) capability can reduce system costs in a future GB electricity grid by up to £12,000 per year, and reduce CO2 emissions by 60 tonnes per year, mainly due to reduced curtailment of wind power. The paper also quantifies the changes in the benefits of fleet V2G resulting from variations in FR delivery time, the penetration of wind or uptake of alternative flexibility providers. Finally , a battery degradation model dependent on an EV's state of charge is proposed and implemented in the stochastic scheduling problem. It enables significant degradation cost reductions of 16% with only a 0.4% reduction of an EV's system value.

preprint2020arXiv

Early Insights into System Impacts of Smart Local Energy Systems

A whole-system, investment-optimising model has been used to examine the change in total cost of meeting demand for electricity when Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES) are deployed. Our assumption is that SLES, alongside their other features, enhance the flexibility of electricity consumption through demand-side response (DSR) and facilitate use of local energy storage. We find that with the flexibility of SLES present, variable renewables such as offshore wind can displace firm but more expensive low-carbon sources such as CCS. Considering a 100 gCO2/kWh emissions target in 2030, a 10% penetration of SLES could reduce total costs by £1.2bn/year relative to no SLES, while at higher penetration of 50% SLES, savings increase twofold to £2.8bn/year. Under a more stringent emissions limit of 25 gCO2/kWh in 2040, the savings rise to £2.9bn/year for 10% SLES uptake and rise threefold to £8.7bn/year at 50% uptake. These results hold for costs of enabling DSR of less than £100/kW and it is not until an unlikely £5,000/kW that the savings are nullified. The savings from substituting wind for CCS remain substantial even if the anticipated reduction of cost of wind in 2040 does not materialise. Cost savings from the flexibility provided by SLES are affected by realisation of domestic DSR through other means. A 20% uptake level of non-SLES DSR in 2040 still allows SLES to create cost savings of £6.8bn/year at 50% penetration (a 20% fall from £8.7bn/year).