BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Mark Wallace

Mark Wallace contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceComputational GeometryData Structures and AlgorithmsHuman-Computer InteractionNeural and Evolutionary ComputingPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The Neighbours' Similar Fitness Property for Local Search

For most practical optimisation problems local search outperforms random sampling - despite the "No Free Lunch Theorem". This paper introduces a property of search landscapes termed Neighbours' Similar Fitness (NSF) that underlies the good performance of neighbourhood search in terms of local improvement. Though necessary, NSF is not sufficient to ensure that searching for improvement among the neighbours of a good solution is better than random search. The paper introduces an additional (natural) property which supports a general proof that, for NSF landscapes, neighbourhood search beats random search.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Steepest ascent can be exponential in bounded treewidth problems

We investigate the complexity of local search based on steepest ascent. We show that even when all variables have domains of size two and the underlying constraint graph of variable interactions has bounded treewidth (in our construction, treewidth 7), there are fitness landscapes for which an exponential number of steps may be required to reach a local optimum. This is an improvement on prior recursive constructions of long steepest ascents, which we prove to need constraint graphs of unbounded treewidth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Improved Optimal and Approximate Power Graph Compression for Clearer Visualisation of Dense Graphs

Drawings of highly connected (dense) graphs can be very difficult to read. Power Graph Analysis offers an alternate way to draw a graph in which sets of nodes with common neighbours are shown grouped into modules. An edge connected to the module then implies a connection to each member of the module. Thus, the entire graph may be represented with much less clutter and without loss of detail. A recent experimental study has shown that such lossless compression of dense graphs makes it easier to follow paths. However, computing optimal power graphs is difficult. In this paper, we show that computing the optimal power-graph with only one module is NP-hard and therefore likely NP-hard in the general case. We give an ILP model for power graph computation and discuss why ILP and CP techniques are poorly suited to the problem. Instead, we are able to find optimal solutions much more quickly using a custom search method. We also show how to restrict this type of search to allow only limited back-tracking to provide a heuristic that has better speed and better results than previously known heuristics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access