Researcher profile

Mark H. Carpenter

Mark H. Carpenter contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Provably Stable Flux Reconstruction High-Order Methods on Curvilinear Elements

Provably stable flux reconstruction (FR) schemes are derived for partial differential equations cast in curvilinear coordinates. Specifically, energy stable flux reconstruction (ESFR) schemes are considered as they allow for design flexibility as well as stability proofs for the linear advection problem on affine elements. Additionally, split forms are examined as they enable the development of energy stability proofs. The first critical step proves, that in curvilinear coordinates, the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) conservative and non-conservative forms are inherently different--even under exact integration and analytically exact metric terms. This analysis demonstrates that the split form is essential to developing provably stable DG schemes on curvilinear coordinates and motivates the construction of metric dependent ESFR correction functions in each element. Furthermore, the provably stable FR schemes differ from schemes in the literature that only apply the ESFR correction functions to surface terms or on the conservative form, and instead incorporate the ESFR correction functions on the full split form of the equations. It is demonstrated that the scheme is divergent when the correction functions are only used for surface reconstruction in curvilinear coordinates. We numerically verify the stability claims for our proposed FR split forms and compare them to ESFR schemes in the literature. Lastly, the newly proposed provably stable FR schemes are shown to obtain optimal orders of convergence. The scheme loses the orders of accuracy at the equivalent correction parameter value c as that of the one-dimensional ESFR scheme.