Source author record

Mark A. Finlayson

Mark A. Finlayson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Finding Trolls Under Bridges: Preliminary Work on a Motif Detector

Motifs are distinctive recurring elements found in folklore that have significance as communicative devices in news, literature, press releases, and propaganda. Motifs concisely imply a large constellation of culturally-relevant information, and their broad usage suggests their cognitive importance as touchstones of cultural knowledge, making their detection a worthy step toward culturally-aware natural language processing tasks. Until now, folklorists and others interested in motifs have only extracted motifs from narratives manually. We present a preliminary report on the development of a system for automatically detecting motifs. We briefly describe an annotation effort to produce data for training motif detection, which is on-going. We describe our in-progress architecture in detail, which aims to capture, in part, how people determine whether or not a motif candidate is being used in a motific way. This description includes a test of an off-the-shelf metaphor detector as a feature for motif detection, which achieves a F1 of 0.35 on motifs and a macro-average F1 of 0.21 across four categories which we assign to motif candidates.

preprint2022arXiv

The ABBE Corpus: Animate Beings Being Emotional

Emotion detection is an established NLP task of demonstrated utility for text understanding. However, basic emotion detection leaves out key information, namely, who is experiencing the emotion in question. For example, it may be the author, the narrator, or a character; or the emotion may correspond to something the audience is supposed to feel, or even be unattributable to a specific being, e.g., when emotions are being discussed per se. We provide the ABBE corpus -- Animate Beings Being Emotional -- a new double-annotated corpus of texts that captures this key information for one class of emotion experiencer, namely, animate beings in the world described by the text. Such a corpus is useful for developing systems that seek to model or understand this specific type of expressed emotion. Our corpus contains 30 chapters, comprising 134,513 words, drawn from the Corpus of English Novels, and contains 2,010 unique emotion expressions attributable to 2,227 animate beings. The emotion expressions are categorized according to Plutchik's 8-category emotion model, and the overall inter-annotator agreement for the annotations was 0.83 Cohen's Kappa, indicating excellent agreement. We describe in detail our annotation scheme and procedure, and also release the corpus for use by other researchers.

preprint2016arXiv

Overview of Annotation Creation: Processes & Tools

Creating linguistic annotations requires more than just a reliable annotation scheme. Annotation can be a complex endeavour potentially involving many people, stages, and tools. This chapter outlines the process of creating end-to-end linguistic annotations, identifying specific tasks that researchers often perform. Because tool support is so central to achieving high quality, reusable annotations with low cost, the focus is on identifying capabilities that are necessary or useful for annotation tools, as well as common problems these tools present that reduce their utility. Although examples of specific tools are provided in many cases, this chapter concentrates more on abstract capabilities and problems because new tools appear continuously, while old tools disappear into disuse or disrepair. The two core capabilities tools must have are support for the chosen annotation scheme and the ability to work on the language under study. Additional capabilities are organized into three categories: those that are widely provided; those that often useful but found in only a few tools; and those that have as yet little or no available tool support.