BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Marius Lombard-Platet

Marius Lombard-Platet appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Cryptography and SecurityData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Approaching Optimal Duplicate Detection in a Sliding Window

Duplicate detection is the problem of identifying whether a given item has previously appeared in a (possibly infinite) stream of data, when only a limited amount of memory is available. Unfortunately the infinite stream setting is ill-posed, and error rates of duplicate detection filters turn out to be heavily constrained: consequently they appear to provide no advantage, asymptotically, over a biased coin toss [8]. In this paper we formalize the sliding window setting introduced by [13,16], and show that a perfect (zero error) solution can be used up to a maximal window size $w_\text{max}$. Above this threshold we show that some existing duplicate detection filters (designed for the $\textit{non-windowed}$ setting) perform better that those targeting the windowed problem. Finally, we introduce a "queuing construction" that improves on the performance of some duplicate detection filters in the windowed setting. We also analyse the security of our filters in an adversarial setting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Keyed Non-Parametric Hypothesis Tests

The recent popularity of machine learning calls for a deeper understanding of AI security. Amongst the numerous AI threats published so far, poisoning attacks currently attract considerable attention. In a poisoning attack the opponent partially tampers the dataset used for learning to mislead the classifier during the testing phase. This paper proposes a new protection strategy against poisoning attacks. The technique relies on a new primitive called keyed non-parametric hypothesis tests allowing to evaluate under adversarial conditions the training input's conformance with a previously learned distribution $\mathfrak{D}$. To do so we use a secret key $κ$ unknown to the opponent. Keyed non-parametric hypothesis tests differs from classical tests in that the secrecy of $κ$ prevents the opponent from misleading the keyed test into concluding that a (significantly) tampered dataset belongs to $\mathfrak{D}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access