Source author record

Marie-Pierre Etienne

Marie-Pierre Etienne appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Identifying partners at sea on contrasting fisheries around the world

Here we present an approach to identify partners at sea based on fishing track analysis, and describe this behaviour in six different fleets: 1) pelagic pair trawlers, 2) large bottom otter trawlers, 3) small bottom otter trawlers, 4) mid-water otter trawlers, all operating in the North-East Atlantic Ocean, 5) anchovy purse-seiners in the South-East Pacific Ocean, and 6) tuna purse-seiners in the Western Indian Ocean. This type of behaviour is known to exist within pelagic pair trawlers. Since these vessels need to be in pairs for their fishing operations, in practice some of them decide to move together throughout their whole fishing trips, and others for only a segment of their trips. To identify partners at sea, we used a heuristic approach based on joint-movement metrics and Gaussian mixture models. The models were first fitted on the pelagic pair trawlers and then used on the other fleets. From all of these fisheries, only the tuna purse-seiners did not present partners at sea. We then analysed the connections at the scale of vessels and identified exclusive partners. This work shows that there are collective tactics at least at a pairwise level in diverse fisheries in the world.

preprint2013arXiv

Extracting abundance indices from longline surveys : method to account for hook competition and unbaited hooks

The most commonly used relative abundance index in stock assessments of longline fisheries is catch per unit effort (CPUE), here defined as the number of fish of the targeted species caught per hook and minute of soak time. Longline CPUE can be affected by interspecific competition and the retrieval of unbaited or empty hooks, and interannual variation in these can lead to biases in the apparent abundance trends in the CPUE. Interspecific competition on longlines has been previously studied but the return of empty hooks is ignored in all current treatments of longline CPUE. In this work we propose some different methods to build indices to address the interspecific competition that relates to empty hooks. We show that in the absence of information about empty hooks, the relative abundance estimates have constant biases with respect to fish density and this is typically not problematic for stock assessment. The simple CPUE index behaves poorly in every scenario. Understanding the reasons for empty hooks allows selection of the appropriate index. A scientific longline survey is conducted every two years in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia by Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The above methods are applied to build the time-series of indices from 2003 to 2009 for quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger). Due to variation in the incidence of non-target species, the index trend obtained is moderately sensitive to the choice of the estimator.