BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Marie-Louise Bruner

Marie-Louise Bruner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.COComputational ComplexityData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

A Fast Algorithm for Permutation Pattern Matching Based on Alternating Runs

The NP-complete Permutation Pattern Matching problem asks whether a $k$-permutation $P$ is contained in a $n$-permutation $T$ as a pattern. This is the case if there exists an order-preserving embedding of $P$ into $T$. In this paper, we present a fixed-parameter algorithm solving this problem with a worst-case runtime of $\mathcal{O}(1.79^{\mathsf{run}(T)}\cdot n\cdot k)$, where $\mathsf{run}(T)$ denotes the number of alternating runs of $T$. This algorithm is particularly well-suited for instances where $T$ has few runs, i.e., few ups and downs. Moreover, since $\mathsf{run}(T)<n$, this can be seen as a $\mathcal{O}(1.79^{n}\cdot n\cdot k)$ algorithm which is the first to beat the exponential $2^n$ runtime of brute-force search. Furthermore, we prove that under standard complexity theoretic assumptions such a fixed-parameter tractability result is not possible for $\mathsf{run}(P)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parking functions for trees and mappings

We apply the concept of parking functions to rooted labelled trees and functional digraphs of mappings (i.e., functions $f : [n] \to [n]$) by considering the nodes as parking spaces and the directed edges as one-way streets: Each driver has a preferred parking space and starting with this node he follows the edges in the graph until he either finds a free parking space or all reachable parking spaces are occupied. If all drivers are successful we speak about a parking function for the tree or mapping. We transfer well-known characterizations of parking functions to trees and mappings. Especially, this yields bounds and characterizations of the extremal cases for the number of parking functions with $m$ drivers for a given tree $T$ of size $n$. Via analytic combinatorics techniques we study the total number $F_{n,m}$ and $M_{n,m}$ of tree and mapping parking functions, respectively, i.e., the number of pairs $(T,s)$ (or $(f,s)$), with $T$ a size-$n$ tree (or $f : [n] \to [n]$ an $n$-mapping) and $s \in [n]^{m}$ a parking function for $T$ (or for $f$) with $m$ drivers, yielding exact and asymptotic results. We describe the phase change behaviour appearing at $m=\frac{n}{2}$ for $F_{n,m}$ and $M_{n,m}$, respectively, and relate it to previously studied combinatorial contexts. Moreover, we give a bijective proof of the occurring relation $n F_{n,m} = M_{n,m}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The computational landscape of permutation patterns

In the last years, different types of patterns in permutations have been studied: vincular, bivincular and mesh patterns, just to name a few. Every type of permutation pattern naturally defines a corresponding computational problem: Given a pattern P and a permutation T (the text), is P contained in T? In this paper we draw a map of the computational landscape of permutation pattern matching with different types of patterns. We provide a classical complexity analysis and investigate the impact of the pattern length on the computational hardness. Furthermore, we highlight several directions in which the study of computational aspects of permutation patterns could evolve.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A short note on the Stanley-Wilf Conjecture for permutations on multisets

The concept of pattern avoidance respectively containment in permutations can be extended to permutations on multisets in a straightforward way. In this note we present a direct proof of the already known fact that the well-known Stanley-Wilf Conjecture, stating that the number of permutations avoiding a given pattern does not grow faster than exponentially, also holds for permutations on multisets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A W[1]-Completeness Result for Generalized Permutation Pattern Matching

The NP-complete Permutation Pattern Matching problem asks whether a permutation P (the pattern) can be matched into a permutation T (the text). A matching is an order-preserving embedding of P into T. In the Generalized Permutation Pattern Matching problem one can additionally enforce that certain adjacent elements in the pattern must be mapped to adjacent elements in the text. This paper studies the parameterized complexity of this more general problem. We show W[1]-completeness with respect to the length of the pattern P. Under standard complexity theoretic assumptions this implies that no fixed-parameter tractable algorithm can be found for any parameter depending solely on P.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On restricted permutations on regular multisets

The extension of pattern avoidance from ordinary permutations to those on multisets gave birth to several interesting enumerative results. We study permutations on regular multisets, i.e., multisets in which each element occurs the same number of times. For this case, we close a gap in the work of Heubach and Mansour (2006) and complete the study of permutations avoiding a pair of patterns of length three. In all studied cases, closed enumeration formulae are given and well-known sequences appear. We conclude this paper by some remarks on a generalization of the Stanley-Wilf conjecture to permutations on multisets and words.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access