BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Marianna Milano

Marianna Milano contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceQuantitative MethodsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMolecular Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Learning Weighted Association Rules in Human Phenotype Ontology

The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is a structured repository of concepts (HPO Terms) that are associated to one or more diseases. The process of association is referred to as annotation. The relevance and the specificity of both HPO terms and annotations are evaluated by a measure defined as Information Content (IC). The analysis of annotated data is thus an important challenge for bioinformatics. There exist different approaches of analysis. From those, the use of Association Rules (AR) may provide useful knowledge, and it has been used in some applications, e.g. improving the quality of annotations. Nevertheless classical association rules algorithms do not take into account the source of annotation nor the importance yielding to the generation of candidate rules with low IC. This paper presents HPO-Miner (Human Phenotype Ontology-based Weighted Association Rules) a methodology for extracting Weighted Association Rules. HPO-Miner can extract relevant rules from a biological point of view. A case study on using of HPO-Miner on publicly available HPO annotation datasets is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The impact of Gene Ontology evolution on GO-Term Information Content

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a major bioinformatics ontology that provides structured controlled vocabularies to classify gene and proteins function and role. The GO and its annotations to gene products are now an integral part of functional analysis. Recently, the evaluation of similarity among gene products starting from their annotations (also referred to as semantic similarities) has become an increasing area in bioinformatics. While many research on updates to the structure of GO and on the annotation corpora have been made, the impact of GO evolution on semantic similarities is quite unobserved. Here we extensively analyze how GO changes that should be carefully considered by all users of semantic similarities. GO changes in particular have a big impact on information content (IC) of GO terms. Since many semantic similarities rely on calculation of IC it is obvious that the study of these changes should be deeply investigated. Here we consider GO versions from 2005 to 2014 and we calculate IC of all GO Terms considering five different formulation. Then we compare these results. Analysis confirm that there exists a statistically significant difference among different calculation on the same version of the ontology (and this is quite obvious) and there exists a statistically difference among the results obtained with different GO version on the same IC formula. Results evidence there exist a remarkable bias due to the GO evolution that has not been considered so far. Possible future works should keep into account this consideration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A web-based tool to Analyze Semantic Similarity Networks

In computational biology, biological entities such as genes or proteins are usually annotated with terms extracted from Gene Ontology (GO). The functional similarity among terms of an ontology is evaluated by using Semantic Similarity Measures (SSM). More recently, the extensive application of SSMs yielded to the Semantic Similarity Networks (SSNs). SSNs are edge-weighted graphs where the nodes are concepts (e.g. proteins) and each edge has an associated weight that represents the semantic similarity among related pairs of nodes. The analysis of SSNs may reveal biologically meaningful knowledge. For these aims, the need for the introduction of tool able to manage and analyze SSN arises. Consequently we developed SSN-Analyzer a web based tool able to build and preprocess SSN. As proof of concept we demonstrate that community detection algorithms applied to filtered (thresholded) networks, have better performances in terms of biological relevance of the results, with respect to the use of raw unfiltered networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access