BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Maria M. Seron

Maria M. Seron contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYmath.OCSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Optimal Responses to Constrained Bolus Inputs to Models of T1D

We characterise the bolus insulin input which minimises the maximum plasma glucose concentration predicted by the Magdelaine and Bergman minimal models in response to any positive bounded disturbance whilst remaining above a fixed lower plasma glucose concentration. This characterisation is in terms of the maxima and minima of the plasma glucose concentration and limits the controllability of such systems. Any further attempt to lower the maximum plasma glucose concentration will result in hypoglycaemia.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Discrete-Time Consensus Networks: Scalability, Grounding and Countermeasures

We investigate the disruption of discrete-time consensus problems via grounding. Loosely speaking, grounding a network occurs if the state of one agent no longer responds to inputs from other agents and/or changes its dynamics. Then, the agent becomes a leader or a so-called stubborn agent. The disruption of the agent can be caused by internal faults, safety protocols or due to an external malicious attack. In this paper we investigate how grounding affects expander graph families that usually exhibit good scaling properties with increasing network size. It is shown that the algebraic connectivity and eigenratio of the network decrease due to the grounding causing the performance and scalability of the network to deteriorate, even to the point of losing consensusability. We then present possible countermeasures to such disruptions and discuss their practicality and limitations. In particular, for a specific countermeasure of deliberately grounding additional nodes, we investigate extensively how to select additional nodes to ground and how many nodes we need to ground to recover the consensus performance. Our findings are supported by a wide range of numerical simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Analysis of Attack via Grounding and Countermeasures in Discrete-Time Consensus Networks

We investigate the disruption of discrete-time consensus problems via grounding. Loosely speaking, grounding a network occurs if the state of one agent no longer responds to inputs from other agents and/or changes its dynamics. Then, the agent becomes a leader or a so called stubborn agent. The disruption of the agent can be caused by internal faults, safety protocols or externally due to a malicious attack. In this paper we investigate how the grounding affects the eigenratio of expander graph families that usually exhibit good scaling properties with increasing network size. It is shown that the algebraic connectivity and eigenratio of the network will decrease due to the grounding causing the performance and scalability of the network to deteriorate, even to the point of losing consensusability. We then present countermeasures to such interruptions both in a passive and active manner. Our findings are supported by numerical simulations given within the paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Scalability and Fragility in Bounded-Degree Consensus Networks

We investigate the performance of linear consensus algorithms subject to a scaling of the underlying network size. Specifically, we model networked systems with $n^{\text{th}}$ order integrator dynamics over families of undirected, weighted graphs with bounded nodal degrees. In such networks, the algebraic connectivity affects convergence rates, sensitivity, and, for high-order consensus ($n \ge 3$), stability properties. This connectivity scales unfavorably in network size, except in expander families, where consensus performs well regardless of network size. We show, however, that consensus over expander families is fragile to a grounding of the network (resulting in leader-follower consensus). We show that grounding may deteriorate system performance by orders of magnitude in large networks, or cause instability in high-order consensus. Our results, which we illustrate through simulations, also point to a fundamental limitation to the scalability of consensus networks with leaders, which does not apply to leaderless networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access