Source author record

Maria Kurnikova

Maria Kurnikova appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Fast and Flexible Geometric Method For Enhancing MC Sampling of Compact Configurations For Protein Docking Problem

EASAL (Efficient Atlasing and Sampling of Assembly Landscapes) is a geometric method for sampling and computing integrals over the potential energy landscape of small molecular assemblies. EASAL's efficiency arises from the fact that small assembly landscapes permit the use of so-called Cayley (inter-atomic distance based) parameters for geometric representation and sampling of the assembly configuration space regions; this results in their isolation, convexification, customized sampling and systematic traversal using a comprehensive topological roadmap. We define custom-designed measurements to investigate and compare various sampling characteristics of EASAL and the traditional Monte Carlo (MC) sampling, including (i) sampling speed, (ii) efficiency and accuracy of uniform grid coverage, (iii) accuracy of weighted coverage at covering low energy regions, (iv) ability to localize sampling to macrostates, and (v) flexibility in sampling distributions. In particular, we compare the sampling characteristics of EASAL and MC in sampling the assembly landscape of 2 trans-membrane helices, with short-range pair-potentials. We demonstrate that EASAL provides a reasonable coverage of crucial but narrow regions of the energy landscape of low effective dimension, with much fewer samples and computational resources than MC sampling. Promising avenues for combining the complementary advantages of the two methods are discussed.