Researcher profile

Margaret Johnson

Margaret Johnson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Automatic Dynamic Relevance Determination for Gaussian process regression with high-dimensional functional inputs

In the context of Gaussian process regression with functional inputs, it is common to treat the input as a vector. The parameter space becomes prohibitively complex as the number of functional points increases, effectively becoming a hindrance for automatic relevance determination in high-dimensional problems. Generalizing a framework for time-varying inputs, we introduce the asymmetric Laplace functional weight (ALF): a flexible, parametric function that drives predictive relevance over the index space. Automatic dynamic relevance determination (ADRD) is achieved with three unknowns per input variable and enforces smoothness over the index space. Additionally, we discuss a screening technique to assess under complete absence of prior and model information whether ADRD is reasonably consistent with the data. Such tool may serve for exploratory analyses and model diagnostics. ADRD is applied to remote sensing data and predictions are generated in response to atmospheric functional inputs. Fully Bayesian estimation is carried out to identify relevant regions of the functional input space. Validation is performed to benchmark against traditional vector-input model specifications. We find that ADRD outperforms models with input dimension reduction via functional principal component analysis. Furthermore, the predictive power is comparable to high-dimensional models, in terms of both mean prediction and uncertainty, with 10 times fewer tuning parameters. Enforcing smoothness on the predictive relevance profile rules out erratic patterns associated with vector-input models.

preprint2020arXiv

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing

We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm 0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $Ω_{\rm m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $σ_8-Ω_{\rm m}$ posteriors in $2.4σ$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6σ$ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold ($λ\ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.