A counterexample to a theorem of Bremermann on Shilov boundaries - revisited
We continue to discuss the example presented in \cite{JarPfl2015}. In particular, we clarify some gaps and complete the description of the Shilov boundary.
Source author record
Marek Jarnicki
Marek Jarnicki appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Catalog footprint
What is connected
6works
1topics
1close collaborators
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
6 published item(s)
preprint2013arXiv
A counterexample to a theorem of Bremermann on Shilov boundaries
We give a counterexample to the following theorem of Bremermann on Shilov boundaries: if $D$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb C^n$ having a univalent envelope of holomorphy, say $\widetilde D$, then the Shilov boundary of $D$ with respect to the algebra $\mathcal A(D)$ coincides with the corresponding one for $\widetilde D$.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv
A note on envelopes of holomorphy
Let $p:X\longrightarrow M$ be a Riemann domain over a connected $n$-dimensional complex submanifold $M$ of $\mathbb C^N$ and let $\mathcal F\subset\mathcal O(X)$ be such that $p\in\mathcal F^N$. Our aim is to discuss relations between the $\mathcal F$-envelope of holomorphy of $(X,p)$ in the sense of Riemann domains over $M$ and the $\mathcal F$-envelope of holomorphy of $X$ in the sense of complex manifolds.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv
A new cross theorem for separately holomorphic functions
We prove a new cross theorem for separately holomorphic functions.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv
Cross theorem with singularities - pluripolar vs. analytic case
We prove that in the extension theorem for separately holomorphic functions on an $N$-fold cross with singularities the case of analytic singularities follows from the case of pluripolar singularities.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv
An elementary proof of the cross theorem in the Reinhardt case
We present an elementary proof of the cross theorem in the case of Reinhardt domains. The results illustrates the well-known interrelations between the holomorphic geometry of a Reinhardt domain and the convex geometry of its logarithmic image.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access