BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Marcin Wrochna

Marcin Wrochna appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.AT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Pliability and Approximating Max-CSPs

We identify a sufficient condition, treewidth-pliability, that gives a polynomial-time algorithm for an arbitrarily good approximation of the optimal value in a large class of Max-2-CSPs parameterised by the class of allowed constraint graphs (with arbitrary constraints on an unbounded alphabet). Our result applies more generally to the maximum homomorphism problem between two rational-valued structures. The condition unifies the two main approaches for designing a polynomial-time approximation scheme. One is Baker's layering technique, which applies to sparse graphs such as planar or excluded-minor graphs. The other is based on Szemerédi's regularity lemma and applies to dense graphs. We extend the applicability of both techniques to new classes of Max-CSPs. On the other hand, we prove that the condition cannot be used to find solutions (as opposed to approximating the optimal value) in general. Treewidth-pliability turns out to be a robust notion that can be defined in several equivalent ways, including characterisations via size, treedepth, or the Hadwiger number. We show connections to the notions of fractional-treewidth-fragility from structural graph theory, hyperfiniteness from the area of property testing, and regularity partitions from the theory of dense graph limits. These may be of independent interest. In particular we show that a monotone class of graphs is hyperfinite if and only if it is fractionally-treewidth-fragile and has bounded degree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Improved hardness for H-colourings of G-colourable graphs

We present new results on approximate colourings of graphs and, more generally, approximate H-colourings and promise constraint satisfaction problems. First, we show NP-hardness of colouring $k$-colourable graphs with $\binom{k}{\lfloor k/2\rfloor}-1$ colours for every $k\geq 4$. This improves the result of Bulín, Krokhin, and Opršal [STOC'19], who gave NP-hardness of colouring $k$-colourable graphs with $2k-1$ colours for $k\geq 3$, and the result of Huang [APPROX-RANDOM'13], who gave NP-hardness of colouring $k$-colourable graphs with $2^{k^{1/3}}$ colours for sufficiently large $k$. Thus, for $k\geq 4$, we improve from known linear/sub-exponential gaps to exponential gaps. Second, we show that the topology of the box complex of H alone determines whether H-colouring of G-colourable graphs is NP-hard for all (non-bipartite, H-colourable) G. This formalises the topological intuition behind the result of Krokhin and Opršal [FOCS'19] that 3-colouring of G-colourable graphs is NP-hard for all (3-colourable, non-bipartite) G. We use this technique to establish NP-hardness of H-colouring of G-colourable graphs for H that include but go beyond $K_3$, including square-free graphs and circular cliques (leaving $K_4$ and larger cliques open). Underlying all of our proofs is a very general observation that adjoint functors give reductions between promise constraint satisfaction problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Linear kernels for edge deletion problems to immersion-closed graph classes

Suppose $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite family of graphs. We consider the following meta-problem, called $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion: given a graph $G$ and integer $k$, decide whether the deletion of at most $k$ edges of $G$ can result in a graph that does not contain any graph from $\mathcal{F}$ as an immersion. This problem is a close relative of the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion problem studied by Fomin et al. [FOCS 2012], where one deletes vertices in order to remove all minor models of graphs from $\mathcal{F}$. We prove that whenever all graphs from $\mathcal{F}$ are connected and at least one graph of $\mathcal{F}$ is planar and subcubic, then the $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion problem admits: a constant-factor approximation algorithm running in time $O(m^3 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$; a linear kernel that can be computed in time $O(m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$; and a $O(2^{O(k)} + m^4 \cdot n^3 \cdot \log m)$-time fixed-parameter algorithm, where $n,m$ count the vertices and edges of the input graph. These results mirror the findings of Fomin et al. [FOCS 2012], who obtained a similar set of algorithmic results for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion, under the assumption that at least one graph from $\mathcal{F}$ is planar. An important difference is that we are able to obtain a linear kernel for $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion, while the exponent of the kernel of Fomin et al. for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion depends heavily on the family $\mathcal{F}$. In fact, this dependence is unavoidable under plausible complexity assumptions, as proven by Giannopoulou et al. [ICALP 2015]. This reveals that the kernelization complexity of $\mathcal{F}$-Immersion Deletion is quite different than that of $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On space efficiency of algorithms working on structural decompositions of graphs

Dynamic programming on path and tree decompositions of graphs is a technique that is ubiquitous in the field of parameterized and exponential-time algorithms. However, one of its drawbacks is that the space usage is exponential in the decomposition's width. Following the work of Allender et al. [Theory of Computing, '14], we investigate whether this space complexity explosion is unavoidable. Using the idea of reparameterization of Cai and Juedes [J. Comput. Syst. Sci., '03], we prove that the question is closely related to a conjecture that the Longest Common Subsequence problem parameterized by the number of input strings does not admit an algorithm that simultaneously uses XP time and FPT space. Moreover, we complete the complexity landscape sketched for pathwidth and treewidth by Allender et al. by considering the parameter tree-depth. We prove that computations on tree-depth decompositions correspond to a model of non-deterministic machines that work in polynomial time and logarithmic space, with access to an auxiliary stack of maximum height equal to the decomposition's depth. Together with the results of Allender et al., this describes a hierarchy of complexity classes for polynomial-time non-deterministic machines with different restrictions on the access to working space, which mirrors the classic relations between treewidth, pathwidth, and tree-depth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Square-free graphs are multiplicative

A graph K is square-free if it contains no four-cycle as a subgraph. A graph K is multiplicative if GxH -> K implies G -> K or H -> K, for all graphs G,H. Here GxH is the tensor (or categorical) graph product and G -> K denotes the existence of a graph homomorphism from G to K. Hedetniemi's conjecture states that all cliques K_n are multiplicative. However, the only non-trivial graphs known to be multiplicative are K_3, odd cycles, and still more generally, circular cliques $K_{p/q}$ with 2 <= p/q < 4. We make no progress for cliques, but show that all square-free graphs are multiplicative. In particular, this gives the first multiplicative graphs of chromatic number higher than 4. Generalizing, in terms of the box complex, the topological insight behind existing proofs for odd cycles, we also give a different proof for circular cliques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Fully polynomial-time parameterized computations for graphs and matrices of low treewidth

We investigate the complexity of several fundamental polynomial-time solvable problems on graphs and on matrices, when the given instance has low treewidth; in the case of matrices, we consider the treewidth of the graph formed by non-zero entries. In each of the considered cases, the best known algorithms working on general graphs run in polynomial time, however the exponent of the polynomial is large. Therefore, our main goal is to construct algorithms with running time of the form $\textrm{poly}(k)\cdot n$ or $\textrm{poly}(k)\cdot n\log n$, where $k$ is the width of the tree decomposition given on the input. Such procedures would outperform the best known algorithms for the considered problems already for moderate values of the treewidth, like $O(n^{1/c})$ for some small constant $c$. Our results include: -- an algorithm for computing the determinant and the rank of an $n\times n$ matrix using $O(k^3\cdot n)$ time and arithmetic operations; -- an algorithm for solving a system of linear equations using $O(k^3\cdot n)$ time and arithmetic operations; -- an $O(k^3\cdot n\log n)$-time randomized algorithm for finding the cardinality of a maximum matching in a graph; -- an $O(k^4\cdot n\log^2 n)$-time randomized algorithm for constructing a maximum matching in a graph; -- an $O(k^2\cdot n\log n)$-time algorithm for finding a maximum vertex flow in a directed graph. Moreover, we give an approximation algorithm for treewidth with time complexity suited to the running times as above. Namely, the algorithm, when given a graph $G$ and integer $k$, runs in time $O(k^7\cdot n\log n)$ and either correctly reports that the treewidth of $G$ is larger than $k$, or constructs a tree decomposition of $G$ of width $O(k^2)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Polynomial kernelization for removing induced claws and diamonds

A graph is called (claw,diamond)-free if it contains neither a claw (a $K_{1,3}$) nor a diamond (a $K_4$ with an edge removed) as an induced subgraph. Equivalently, (claw,diamond)-free graphs can be characterized as line graphs of triangle-free graphs, or as linear dominoes, i.e., graphs in which every vertex is in at most two maximal cliques and every edge is in exactly one maximal clique. In this paper we consider the parameterized complexity of the (claw,diamond)-free Edge Deletion problem, where given a graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, the question is whether one can remove at most $k$ edges from $G$ to obtain a (claw,diamond)-free graph. Our main result is that this problem admits a polynomial kernel. We complement this finding by proving that, even on instances with maximum degree $6$, the problem is NP-complete and cannot be solved in time $2^{o(k)}\cdot |V(G)|^{O(1)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fail

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reconfiguration in bounded bandwidth and treedepth

We show that several reconfiguration problems known to be PSPACE-complete remain so even when limited to graphs of bounded bandwidth. The essential step is noticing the similarity to very limited string rewriting systems, whose ability to directly simulate Turing Machines is classically known. This resolves a question posed open in [Bonsma P., 2012]. On the other hand, we show that a large class of reconfiguration problems becomes tractable on graphs of bounded treedepth, and that this result is in some sense tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reconfiguration over tree decompositions

A vertex-subset graph problem $Q$ defines which subsets of the vertices of an input graph are feasible solutions. The reconfiguration version of a vertex-subset problem $Q$ asks whether it is possible to transform one feasible solution for $Q$ into another in at most $\ell$ steps, where each step is a vertex addition or deletion, and each intermediate set is also a feasible solution for $Q$ of size bounded by $k$. Motivated by recent results establishing W[1]-hardness of the reconfiguration versions of most vertex-subset problems parameterized by $\ell$, we investigate the complexity of such problems restricted to graphs of bounded treewidth. We show that the reconfiguration versions of most vertex-subset problems remain PSPACE-complete on graphs of treewidth at most $t$ but are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $\ell + t$ for all vertex-subset problems definable in monadic second-order logic (MSOL). To prove the latter result, we introduce a technique which allows us to circumvent cardinality constraints and define reconfiguration problems in MSOL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reconfiguring Independent Sets in Claw-Free Graphs

We present a polynomial-time algorithm that, given two independent sets in a claw-free graph $G$, decides whether one can be transformed into the other by a sequence of elementary steps. Each elementary step is to remove a vertex $v$ from the current independent set $S$ and to add a new vertex $w$ (not in $S$) such that the result is again an independent set. We also consider the more restricted model where $v$ and $w$ have to be adjacent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access