BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Marcin Raniszewski

Marcin Raniszewski contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
6works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Rank and select: Another lesson learned

Rank and select queries on bitmaps are essential building bricks of many compressed data structures, including text indexes, membership and range supporting spatial data structures, compressed graphs, and more. Theoretically considered yet in 1980s, these primitives have also been a subject of vivid research concerning their practical incarnations in the last decade. We present a few novel rank/select variants, focusing mostly on speed, obtaining competitive space-time results in the compressed setting. Our findings can be summarized as follows: $(i)$ no single rank/select solution works best on any kind of data (ours are optimized for concatenated bit arrays obtained from wavelet trees for real text datasets), $(ii)$ it pays to efficiently handle blocks consisting of all 0 or all 1 bits, $(iii)$ compressed select does not have to be significantly slower than compressed rank at a comparable memory use.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Suffix arrays with a twist

The suffix array is a classic full-text index, combining effectiveness with simplicity. We discuss three approaches aiming to improve its efficiency even more: changes to the navigation, data layout and adding extra data. In short, we show that $(i)$ how we search for the right interval boundary impacts significantly the overall search speed, $(ii)$ a B-tree data layout easily wins over the standard one, $(iii)$ the well-known idea of a lookup table for the prefixes of the suffixes can be refined with using compression, $(iv)$ caching prefixes of the suffixes in a helper array can pose a(nother) practical space-time tradeoff.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Two simple full-text indexes based on the suffix array

We propose two suffix array inspired full-text indexes. One, called SA-hash, augments the suffix array with a hash table to speed up pattern searches due to significantly narrowed search interval before the binary search phase. The other, called FBCSA, is a compact data structure, similar to M{ä}kinen's compact suffix array, but working on fixed sized blocks. Experiments on the Pizza~\&~Chili 200\,MB datasets show that SA-hash is about 2--3 times faster in pattern searches (counts) than the standard suffix array, for the price of requiring $0.2n-1.1n$ bytes of extra space, where $n$ is the text length, and setting a minimum pattern length. FBCSA is relatively fast in single cell accesses (a few times faster than related indexes at about the same or better compression), but not competitive if many consecutive cells are to be extracted. Still, for the task of extracting, e.g., 10 successive cells its time-space relation remains attractive.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

FM-index for dummies

The FM-index is a celebrated compressed data structure for full-text pattern searching. After the first wave of interest in its theoretical developments, we can observe a surge of interest in practical FM-index variants in the last few years. These enhancements are often related to a bit-vector representation, augmented with an efficient rank-handling data structure. In this work, we propose a new, cache-friendly, implementation of the rank primitive and advocate for a very simple architecture of the FM-index, which trades compression ratio for speed. Experimental results show that our variants are 2--3 times faster than the fastest known ones, for the price of using typically 1.5--5 times more space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Sampling the suffix array with minimizers

Sampling (evenly) the suffixes from the suffix array is an old idea trading the pattern search time for reduced index space. A few years ago Claude et al. showed an alphabet sampling scheme allowing for more efficient pattern searches compared to the sparse suffix array, for long enough patterns. A drawback of their approach is the requirement that sought patterns need to contain at least one character from the chosen subalphabet. In this work we propose an alternative suffix sampling approach with only a minimum pattern length as a requirement, which seems more convenient in practice. Experiments show that our algorithm achieves competitive time-space tradeoffs on most standard benchmark data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access