BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Marc Goerigk

Marc Goerigk appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.OCData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational Complexityeess.SYNeural and Evolutionary ComputingSystems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

21works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

21 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A faster exact method for solving the robust multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem

This paper presents a mixed-integer linear programming formulation for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations. We consider a two-stage robust optimisation approach and find solutions that minimise the worst-case project makespan, whilst assuming that activity durations lie in a budgeted uncertainty set. Computational experiments show that this easy-to-implement formulation is many times faster than the current state-of-the-art solution approach for this problem, whilst solving over 40% more instances to optimality over the same benchmarking set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Benchmarking Problems for Robust Discrete Optimization

Robust discrete optimization is a highly active field of research where a plenitude of combinations between decision criteria, uncertainty sets and underlying nominal problems are considered. Usually, a robust problem becomes harder to solve than its nominal counterpart, even if it remains in the same complexity class. For this reason, specialized solution algorithms have been developed. To further drive the development of stronger solution algorithms and to facilitate the comparison between methods, a set of benchmark instances is necessary but so far missing. In this paper we propose a further step towards this goal by proposing several instance generation procedures for combinations of min-max, min-max regret, two-stage and recoverable robustness with interval, discrete or budgeted uncertainty sets. Besides sampling methods that go beyond the simple uniform sampling method that is the de-facto standard to produce instances, also optimization models to construct hard instances are considered. Using a selection problem for the nominal ground problem, we are able to generate instances that are several orders of magnitudes harder to solve than uniformly sampled instances when solving them with a general mixed-integer programming solver. All instances and generator codes are made available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Investigating the Recoverable Robust Single Machine Scheduling Problem Under Interval Uncertainty

We investigate the recoverable robust single machine scheduling problem under interval uncertainty. In this setting, jobs have first-stage processing times p and second-stage processing times q and we aim to find a first-stage and second-stage schedule with a minimum combined sum of completion times, such that at least Delta jobs share the same position in both schedules. We provide positive complexity results for some important special cases of this problem, as well as derive a 2-approximation algorithm to the full problem. Computational experiments examine the performance of an exact mixed-integer programming formulation and the approximation algorithm, and demonstrate the strength of a proposed polynomial time greedy heuristic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Optimal Scenario Reduction for One- and Two-Stage Robust Optimization

Robust optimization typically follows a worst-case perspective, where a single scenario may determine the objective value of a given solution. Accordingly, it is a challenging task to reduce the size of an uncertainty set without changing the resulting objective value too much. On the other hand, robust optimization problems with many scenarios tend to be hard to solve, in particular for two-stage problems. Hence, a reduced uncertainty set may be central to find solutions in reasonable time. We propose scenario reduction methods that give guarantees on the performance of the resulting robust solution. Scenario reduction problems for one- and two-stage robust optimization are framed as optimization problems that only depend on the uncertainty set and not on the underlying decision making problem. Experimental results indicate that objective values for the reduced uncertainty sets are closely correlated to original objective values, resulting in better solutions than when using general-purpose clustering methods such as K-means.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Recoverable Robust Single Machine Scheduling with Polyhedral Uncertainty

This paper considers a recoverable robust single-machine scheduling problem under polyhedral uncertainty with the objective of minimising the total flow time. In this setting, a decision-maker must determine a first-stage schedule subject to the uncertain job processing times. Then following the realisation of these processing times, they have the option to swap the positions of up to Delta disjoint pairs of jobs to obtain a second-stage schedule. We first formulate this scheduling problem using a general recoverable robust framework, before we examine the incremental subproblem in further detail. We prove a general result for max-weight matching problems, showing that for edge weights of a specific form, the matching polytope can be fully characterised by polynomially many constraints. We use this result to derive a matching-based compact formulation for the full problem. Further analysis of the incremental problem leads to an additional assignment-based compact formulation. Computational results on budgeted uncertainty sets compare the relative strengths of the three compact models we propose.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Comparison of Discrete and Polyhedral Uncertainty Sets for Robust Network Design

We consider a network design and expansion problem, where we need to make a capacity investment now, such that uncertain future demand can be satisfied as closely as possible. To use a robust optimization approach, we need to construct an uncertainty set that contains all scenarios that we believe to be possible. In this paper we discuss how to construct two common types of uncertainty sets, which are discrete and polyhedral uncertainty, using real-world data. We employ clustering to generate a discrete uncertainty set, and place hyperplanes sequentially to generate a polyhedral uncertainty set. We then compare the performance of the resulting robust solutions for these two types of models on real-world data. Our results indicate that polyhedral models, while being popular in the recent network design literature, are less effective than discrete models both in terms of computational burden and solution quality with respect to the performance measure considered.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Multistage Robust Discrete Optimization via Quantified Integer Programming

Decision making needs to take an uncertain environment into account. Over the last decades, robust optimization has emerged as a preeminent method to produce solutions that are immunized against uncertainty. The main focus in robust discrete optimization has been on the analysis and solution of one- or two-stage problems, where the decision maker has limited options in reacting to additional knowledge gained after parts of the solution have been fixed. Due to its computational difficulty, multistage problems beyond two stages have received less attention. In this paper we argue that multistage robust discrete problems can be seen through the lens of quantified integer programs, where powerful tools to reduce the search tree size have been developed. By formulating both integer and quantified integer programming formulations, it is possible to compare the performance of state-of-the-art solvers from both worlds. Using selection, assignment, lot-sizing and knapsack problems as a testbed, we show that problems with up to nine stages can be solved to optimality in reasonable time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Recoverable Robust Representatives Selection Problems with Discrete Budgeted Uncertainty

Recoverable robust optimization is a multi-stage approach, where it is possible to adjust a first-stage solution after the uncertain cost scenario is revealed. We analyze this approach for a class of selection problems. The aim is to choose a fixed number of items from several disjoint sets, such that the worst-case costs after taking a recovery action are as small as possible. The uncertainty is modeled as a discrete budgeted set, where the adversary can increase the costs of a fixed number of items. While special cases of this problem have been studied before, its complexity has remained open. In this work we make several contributions towards closing this gap. We show that the problem is NP-hard and identify a special case that remains solvable in polynomial time. We provide a compact mixed-integer programming formulation and two additional extended formulations. Finally, computational results are provided that compare the efficiency of different exact solution approaches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Two-Stage Robust Optimization Problems with Two-Stage Uncertainty

We consider two-stage robust optimization problems, which can be seen as games between a decision maker and an adversary. After the decision maker fixes part of the solution, the adversary chooses a scenario from a specified uncertainty set. Afterwards, the decision maker can react to this scenario by completing the partial first-stage solution to a full solution. We extend this classic setting by adding another adversary stage after the second decision-maker stage, which results in min-max-min-max problems, thus pushing two-stage settings further towards more general multi-stage problems. We focus on budgeted uncertainty sets and consider both the continuous and discrete case. For the former, we show that a wide range of robust combinatorial optimization problems can be decomposed into polynomially many subproblems, which can be solved in polynomial time for example in the case of (\textsc{representative}) \textsc{selection}. For the latter, we prove NP-hardness for a wide range of problems, but note that the special case where first- and second-stage adversarial costs are equal can remain solvable in polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A compact reformulation of the two-stage robust resource-constrained project scheduling problem

This paper considers the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with uncertain activity durations. We assume that activity durations lie in a budgeted uncertainty set, and follow a robust two-stage approach, where a decision maker must resolve resource conflicts subject to the problem uncertainty, but can determine activity start times after the uncertain activity durations become known. We introduce a new reformulation of the second-stage problem, which enables us to derive a compact robust counterpart to the full two-stage adjustable robust optimisation problem. Computational experiments show that this compact robust counterpart can be solved using standard optimisation software significantly faster than the current state-of-the-art algorithm for solving this problem, reaching optimality for almost 50% more instances on the same benchmark set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Efficient Approach to Distributionally Robust Network Capacity Planning

In this paper, we consider a network capacity expansion problem in the context of telecommunication networks, where there is uncertainty associated with the expected traffic demand. We employ a distributionally robust stochastic optimization (DRSO) framework where the ambiguity set of the uncertain demand distribution is constructed using the moments information, the mean and variance. The resulting DRSO problem is formulated as a bilevel optimization problem. We develop an efficient solution algorithm for this problem by characterizing the resulting worst-case two-point distribution, which allows us to reformulate the original problem as a convex optimization problem. In computational experiments the performance of this approach is compared to that of the robust optimization approach with a discrete uncertainty set. The results show that solutions from the DRSO model outperform the robust optimization approach on highly risk-averse performance metrics, whereas the robust solution is better on the less risk-averse metric.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Automatic Generation of Algorithms for Black-Box Robust Optimisation Problems

We develop algorithms capable of tackling robust black-box optimisation problems, where the number of model runs is limited. When a desired solution cannot be implemented exactly the aim is to find a robust one, where the worst case in an uncertainty neighbourhood around a solution still performs well. This requires a local maximisation within a global minimisation. To investigate improved optimisation methods for robust problems, and remove the need to manually determine an effective heuristic and parameter settings, we employ an automatic generation of algorithms approach: Grammar-Guided Genetic Programming. We develop algorithmic building blocks to be implemented in a Particle Swarm Optimisation framework, define the rules for constructing heuristics from these components, and evolve populations of search algorithms. Our algorithmic building blocks combine elements of existing techniques and new features, resulting in the investigation of a novel heuristic solution space. As a result of this evolutionary process we obtain algorithms which improve upon the current state of the art. We also analyse the component level breakdowns of the populations of algorithms developed against their performance, to identify high-performing heuristic components for robust problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Combinatorial two-stage minmax regret problems under interval uncertainty

In this paper a class of combinatorial optimization problems is discussed. It is assumed that a feasible solution can be constructed in two stages. In the first stage the objective function costs are known while in the second stage they are uncertain and belong to an interval uncertainty set. In order to choose a solution, the minmax regret criterion is used. Some general properties of the problem are established and results for two particular problems, namely the shortest path and the selection problem, are shown.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Particle Swarm Metaheuristics for Robust Optimisation with Implementation Uncertainty

We consider global non-convex optimisation problems under uncertainty. In this setting, it is not possible to implement a desired solution exactly. Instead, any other solution within some distance to the intended solution may be implemented. The aim is to find a robust solution, i.e., one where the worst possible solution nearby still performs as well as possible. Problems of this type exhibit another maximisation layer to find the worst case solution within the minimisation level of finding a robust solution, which makes them harder to solve than classic global optimisation problems. So far, only few methods have been provided that can be applied to black-box problems with implementation uncertainty. We improve upon existing techniques by introducing a novel particle swarm based framework which adapts elements of previous approaches, combining them with new features in order to generate more effective techniques. In computational experiments, we find that our new method outperforms state of the art comparator heuristics in almost 80% of cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Combinatorial Optimization with Locally Budgeted Uncertainty

Budgeted uncertainty sets have been established as a major influence on uncertainty modeling for robust optimization problems. A drawback of such sets is that the budget constraint only restricts the global amount of cost increase that can be distributed by an adversary. Local restrictions, while being important for many applications, cannot be modeled this way. We introduce new variant of budgeted uncertainty sets, called locally budgeted uncertainty. In this setting, the uncertain parameters become partitioned, such that a classic budgeted uncertainty set applies to each partition, called region. In a theoretical analysis, we show that the robust counterpart of such problems for a constant number of regions remains solvable in polynomial time, if the underlying nominal problem can be solved in polynomial time as well. If the number of regions is unbounded, we show that the robust selection problem remains solvable in polynomial time, while also providing hardness results for other combinatorial problems. In computational experiments using both random and real-world data, we show that using locally budgeted uncertainty sets can have considerable advantages over classic budgeted uncertainty sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A biobjective approach to robustness based on location planning

Finding robust solutions of an optimization problem is an important issue in practice, and various concepts on how to define the robustness of a solution have been suggested. The idea of recoverable robustness requires that a solution can be recovered to a feasible one as soon as the realized scenario becomes known. The usual approach in the literature is to minimize the objective function value of the recovered solution in the nominal or in the worst case. As the recovery itself is also costly, there is a trade-off between the recovery costs and the solution value obtained; we study both, the recovery costs and the solution value in the worst case in a biobjective setting. To this end, we assume that the recovery costs can be described by a metric. We demonstrate that this leads to a location planning problem, bringing together two fields of research which have been considered separate so far. We show how weakly Pareto efficient solutions to this biobjective problem can be computed by minimizing the recovery costs for a fixed worst-case objective function value and present approaches for the case of linear and quasiconvex problems for finite uncertainty sets. We furthermore derive cases in which the size of the uncertainty set can be reduced without changing the set of Pareto efficient solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Algorithm Engineering in Robust Optimization

Robust optimization is a young and emerging field of research having received a considerable increase of interest over the last decade. In this paper, we argue that the the algorithm engineering methodology fits very well to the field of robust optimization and yields a rewarding new perspective on both the current state of research and open research directions. To this end we go through the algorithm engineering cycle of design and analysis of concepts, development and implementation of algorithms, and theoretical and experimental evaluation. We show that many ideas of algorithm engineering have already been applied in publications on robust optimization. Most work on robust optimization is devoted to analysis of the concepts and the development of algorithms, some papers deal with the evaluation of a particular concept in case studies, and work on comparison of concepts just starts. What is still a drawback in many papers on robustness is the missing link to include the results of the experiments again in the design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Compromise Solutions for Robust Combinatorial Optimization with Variable-Sized Uncertainty

In classic robust optimization, it is assumed that a set of possible parameter realizations, the uncertainty set, is modeled in a previous step and part of the input. As recent work has shown, finding the most suitable uncertainty set is in itself already a difficult task. We consider robust problems where the uncertainty set is not completely defined. Only the shape is known, but not its size. Such a setting is known as variable-sized uncertainty. In this work we present an approach how to find a single robust solution, that performs well on average over all possible uncertainty set sizes. We demonstrate that this approach can be solved efficiently for min-max robust optimization, but is more involved in the case of min-max regret, where positive and negative complexity results for the selection problem, the minimum spanning tree problem, and the shortest path problem are provided. We introduce an iterative solution procedure, and evaluate its performance in an experimental comparison.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Improvable Knapsack Problems

We consider a variant of the knapsack problem, where items are available with different possible weights. Using a separate budget for these item improvements, the question is: Which items should be improved to which degree such that the resulting classic knapsack problem yields maximum profit? We present a detailed analysis for several cases of improvable knapsack problems, presenting constant factor approximation algorithms and two PTAS.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On Scenario Aggregation to Approximate Robust Optimization Problems

As most robust combinatorial min-max and min-max regret problems with discrete uncertainty sets are NP-hard, research into approximation algorithm and approximability bounds has been a fruitful area of recent work. A simple and well-known approximation algorithm is the midpoint method, where one takes the average over all scenarios, and solves a problem of nominal type. Despite its simplicity, this method still gives the best-known bound on a wide range of problems, such as robust shortest path, or robust assignment problems. In this paper we present a simple extension of the midpoint method based on scenario aggregation, which improves the current best $K$-approximation result to an $(\varepsilon K)$-approximation for any desired $\varepsilon > 0$. Our method can be applied to min-max as well as min-max regret problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Variable-Sized Uncertainty and Inverse Problems in Robust Optimization

In robust optimization, the general aim is to find a solution that performs well over a set of possible parameter outcomes, the so-called uncertainty set. In this paper, we assume that the uncertainty size is not fixed, and instead aim at finding a set of robust solutions that covers all possible uncertainty set outcomes. We refer to these problems as robust optimization with variable-sized uncertainty. We discuss how to construct smallest possible sets of min-max robust solutions and give bounds on their size. A special case of this perspective is to analyze for which uncertainty sets a nominal solution ceases to be a robust solution, which amounts to an inverse robust optimization problem. We consider this problem with a min-max regret objective and present mixed-integer linear programming formulations that can be applied to construct suitable uncertainty sets. Results on both variable-sized uncertainty and inverse problems are further supported with experimental data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access