BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Manuel Lafond

Manuel Lafond appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsGenomicsmath.COComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsphysics.soc-phq-fin.TRSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A $O^*((2 + ε)^k)$ Time Algorithm for Cograph Deletion Using Unavoidable Subgraphs in Large Prime Graphs

We study the parameterized complexity of the Cograph Deletion problem, which asks whether one can delete at most $k$ edges from a graph to make it $P_4$-free. This is a well-known graph modification problem with applications in computation biology and social network analysis. All current parameterized algorithms use a similar strategy, which is to find a $P_4$ and explore the local structure around it to perform an efficient recursive branching. The best known algorithm achieves running time $O^*(2.303^k)$ and requires an automated search of the branching cases due to their complexity. Since it appears difficult to further improve the current strategy, we devise a new approach using modular decompositions. We solve each module and the quotient graph independently, with the latter being the core problem. This reduces the problem to solving on a prime graph, in which all modules are trivial. We then use a characterization of Chudnovsky et al. stating that any large enough prime graph has one of seven structures as an induced subgraph. These all have many $P_4$s, with the quantity growing linearly with the graph size, and we show that these allow a recursive branch tree algorithm to achieve running time $O^*((2 + ε)^k)$ for any $ε> 0$. This appears to be the first algorithmic application of the prime graph characterization and it could be applicable to other modification problems. Towards this goal, we provide the exact set of graph classes $\H$ for which the $\H$-free editing problem can make use of our reduction to a prime graph, opening the door to improvements for other modification problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Consistency of orthology and paralogy constraints in the presence of gene transfers

Orthology and paralogy relations are often inferred by methods based on gene similarity, which usually yield a graph depicting the relationships between gene pairs. Such relation graphs are known to frequently contain errors, as they cannot be explained via a gene tree that both contains the depicted orthologs/paralogs, and that is consistent with a species tree $S$. This idea of detecting errors through inconsistency with a species tree has mostly been studied in the presence of speciation and duplication events only. In this work, we ask: could the given set of relations be consistent if we allow lateral gene transfers in the evolutionary model? We formalize this question and provide a variety of algorithmic results regarding the underlying problems. Namely, we show that deciding if a relation graph $R$ is consistent with a given species network $N$ is NP-hard, and that it is W[1]-hard under the parameter "minimum number of transfers". However, we present an FPT algorithm based on the degree of the $DS$-tree associated with $R$. We also study analogous problems in the case that the transfer highways on a species tree are unknown.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

How brokers can optimally plot against traders

Traders buy and sell financial instruments in hopes of making profit, and brokers are responsible for the transaction. There are several hypotheses and conspiracy theories arguing that in some situations, brokers want their traders to lose money. For instance, a broker may want to protect the positions of a privileged customer. Another example is that some brokers take positions opposite to their traders', in which case they make money whenever their traders lose money. These are reasons for which brokers might manipulate prices in order to maximize the losses of their traders. In this paper, our goal is to perform this shady task optimally -- or at least to check whether this can actually be done algorithmically. Assuming total control over the price of an asset (ignoring the usual aspects of finance such as market conditions, external influence or stochasticity), we show how in quadratic time, given a set of trades specified by a stop-loss and a take-profit price, a broker can find a maximum loss price movement. We also look at an online trade model where broker and trader exchange turns, each trying to make a profit. We show in which condition either side can make a profit, and that the best option for the trader is to never trade.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Comparing copy-number profiles under multi-copy amplifications and deletions

During cancer progression, malignant cells accumulate somatic mutations that can lead to genetic aberrations. In particular, evolutionary events akin to segmental duplications or deletions can alter the copy-number profile (CNP) of a set of genes in a genome. Our aim is to compute the evolutionary distance between two cells for which only CNPs are known. This asks for the minimum number of segmental amplifications and deletions to turn one CNP into another. This was recently formalized into a model where each event is assumed to alter a copy-number by $1$ or $-1$, even though these events can affect large portions of a chromosome. We propose a general cost framework where an event can modify the copy-number of a gene by larger amounts. We show that any cost scheme that allows segmental deletions of arbitrary length makes computing the distance strongly NP-hard. We then devise a factor $2$ approximation algorithm for the problem when copy-numbers are non-zero and provide an implementation called \textsf{cnp2cnp}. We evaluate our approach experimentally by reconstructing simulated cancer phylogenies from the pairwise distances inferred by \textsf{cnp2cnp} and compare it against two other alternatives, namely the \textsf{MEDICC} distance and the Euclidean distance. The experimental results show that our distance yields more accurate phylogenies on average than these alternatives if the given CNPs are error-free, but that the \textsf{MEDICC} distance is slightly more robust against error in the data. In all cases, our experiments show that either our approach or the \textsf{MEDICC} approach should preferred over the Euclidean distance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Genomic Problems Involving Copy Number Profiles: Complexity and Algorithms

Recently, due to the genomic sequence analysis in several types of cancer, the genomic data based on {\em copy number profiles} ({\em CNP} for short) are getting more and more popular. A CNP is a vector where each component is a non-negative integer representing the number of copies of a specific gene or segment of interest. In this paper, we present two streams of results. The first is the negative results on two open problems regarding the computational complexity of the Minimum Copy Number Generation (MCNG) problem posed by Qingge et al. in 2018. It was shown by Qingge et al. that the problem is NP-hard if the duplications are tandem and they left the open question of whether the problem remains NP-hard if arbitrary duplications are used. We answer this question affirmatively in this paper; in fact, we prove that it is NP-hard to even obtain a constant factor approximation. We also prove that the parameterized version is W[1]-hard, answering another open question by Qingge et al. The other result is positive and is based on a new (and more general) problem regarding CNP's. The \emph{Copy Number Profile Conforming (CNPC)} problem is formally defined as follows: given two CNP's $C_1$ and $C_2$, compute two strings $S_1$ and $S_2$ with $cnp(S_1)=C_1$ and $cnp(S_2)=C_2$ such that the distance between $S_1$ and $S_2$, $d(S_1,S_2)$, is minimized. Here, $d(S_1,S_2)$ is a very general term, which means it could be any genome rearrangement distance (like reversal, transposition, and tandem duplication, etc). We make the first step by showing that if $d(S_1,S_2)$ is measured by the breakpoint distance then the problem is polynomially solvable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Gene Tree Construction and Correction using SuperTree and Reconciliation

The supertree problem asking for a tree displaying a set of consistent input trees has been largely considered for the reconstruction of species trees. Here, we rather explore this framework for the sake of reconstructing a gene tree from a set of input gene trees on partial data. In this perspective, the phylogenetic tree for the species containing the genes of interest can be used to choose among the many possible compatible "supergenetrees", the most natural criteria being to minimize a reconciliation cost. We develop a variety of algorithmic solutions for the construction and correction of gene trees using the supertree framework. A dynamic programming supertree algorithm for constructing or correcting gene trees, exponential in the number of input trees, is first developed for the less constrained version of the problem. It is then adapted to gene trees with nodes labeled as duplication or speciation, the additional constraint being to preserve the orthology and paralogy relations between genes. Then, a quadratic time algorithm is developed for efficiently correcting an initial gene tree while preserving a set of "trusted" subtrees, as well as the relative phylogenetic distance between them, in both cases of labeled or unlabeled input trees. By applying these algorithms to the set of Ensembl gene trees, we show that this new correction framework is particularly useful to correct weaklysupported duplication nodes. The C++ source code for the algorithms and simulations described in the paper are available at https://github.com/UdeM-LBIT/SuGeT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The SCJ small parsimony problem for weighted gene adjacencies (Extended version)

Reconstructing ancestral gene orders in a given phylogeny is a classical problem in comparative genomics. Most existing methods compare conserved features in extant genomes in the phylogeny to define potential ancestral gene adjacencies, and either try to reconstruct all ancestral genomes under a global evolutionary parsimony criterion, or, focusing on a single ancestral genome, use a scaffolding approach to select a subset of ancestral gene adjacencies, generally aiming at reducing the fragmentation of the reconstructed ancestral genome. In this paper, we describe an exact algorithm for the Small Parsimony Problem that combines both approaches. We consider that gene adjacencies at internal nodes of the species phylogeny are weighted, and we introduce an objective function defined as a convex combination of these weights and the evolutionary cost under the Single-Cut-or-Join (SCJ) model. The weights of ancestral gene adjacencies can e.g. be obtained through the recent availability of ancient DNA sequencing data, which provide a direct hint at the genome structure of the considered ancestor, or through probabilistic analysis of gene adjacencies evolution. We show the NP-hardness of our problem variant and propose a Fixed-Parameter Tractable algorithm based on the Sankoff-Rousseau dynamic programming algorithm that also allows to sample co-optimal solutions. We apply our approach to mammalian and bacterial data providing different degrees of complexity. We show that including adjacency weights in the objective has a significant impact in reducing the fragmentation of the reconstructed ancestral gene orders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Whom to befriend to influence people

Alice wants to join a new social network, and influence its members to adopt a new product or idea. Each person $v$ in the network has a certain threshold $t(v)$ for {\em activation}, i.e adoption of the product or idea. If $v$ has at least $t(v)$ activated neighbors, then $v$ will also become activated. If Alice wants to activate the entire social network, whom should she befriend? More generally, we study the problem of finding the minimum number of links that a set of external influencers should form to people in the network, in order to activate the entire social network. This {\em Minimum Links} Problem has applications in viral marketing and the study of epidemics. Its solution can be quite different from the related and widely studied Target Set Selection problem. We prove that the Minimum Links problem cannot be approximated to within a ratio of $O(2^{\log^{1-ε} n})$, for any fixed $ε>0$, unless $NP\subseteq DTIME(n^{polylog(n)})$, where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network. On the positive side, we give linear time algorithms to solve the problem for trees, cycles, and cliques, for any given set of external influencers, and give precise bounds on the number of links needed. For general graphs, we design a polynomial time algorithm to compute size-efficient link sets that can activate the entire graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Hamiltonian chordal graphs are not cycle extendible

In 1990, Hendry conjectured that every Hamiltonian chordal graph is cycle extendible; that is, the vertices of any non-Hamiltonian cycle are contained in a cycle of length one greater. We disprove this conjecture by constructing counterexamples on $n$ vertices for any $n \geq 15$. Furthermore, we show that there exist counterexamples where the ratio of the length of a non-extendible cycle to the total number of vertices can be made arbitrarily small. We then consider cycle extendibility in Hamiltonian chordal graphs where certain induced subgraphs are forbidden, notably $P_n$ and the bull.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access