Researcher profile

Malik Imran

Malik Imran contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multiplierless Design of Very Large Constant Multiplications in Cryptography

This brief addresses the problem of implementing very large constant multiplications by a single variable under the shift-adds architecture using a minimum number of adders/subtractors. Due to the intrinsic complexity of the problem, we introduce an approximate algorithm, called TÕLL, which partitions the very large constants into smaller ones. To reduce the number of operations, TÕLL incorporates graph-based and common subexpression elimination methods proposed for the shift-adds design of constant multiplications. It can also consider the delay of a multiplierless design defined in terms of the maximum number of operations in series, i.e., the number of adder-steps, while reducing the number of operations. High-level experimental results show that the adder-steps of a shift-adds design can be reduced significantly with a little overhead in the number of operations. Gate-level experimental results indicate that while the shift-adds design can lead to a 36.6\% reduction in gate-level area with respect to a design using a multiplier, the delay-aware optimization can yield a 48.3\% reduction in minimum achievable delay of the shift-adds design when compared to the area-aware optimization.

preprint2020arXiv

A Systematic Study of Lattice-based NIST PQC Algorithms: from Reference Implementations to Hardware Accelerators

Security of currently deployed public key cryptography algorithms is foreseen to be vulnerable against quantum computer attacks. Hence, a community effort exists to develop post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms, i.e., algorithms that are resistant to quantum attacks. In this work, we have investigated how lattice-based candidate algorithms from the NIST PQC standardization competition fare when conceived as hardware accelerators. To achieve this, we have assessed the reference implementations of selected algorithms with the goal of identifying what are their basic building blocks. We assume the hardware accelerators will be implemented in application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) and the targeted technology in our experiments is a commercial 65nm node. In order to estimate the characteristics of each algorithm, we have assessed their memory requirements, use of multipliers, and how each algorithm employs hashing functions. Furthermore, for these building blocks, we have collected area and power figures for 12 candidate algorithms. For memories, we make use of a commercial memory compiler. For logic, we make use of a standard cell library. In order to compare the candidate algorithms fairly, we select a reference frequency of operation of 500MHz. Our results reveal that our area and power numbers are comparable to the state of the art, despite targeting a higher frequency of operation and a higher security level in our experiments. The comprehensive investigation of lattice-based NIST PQC algorithms performed in this paper can be used for guiding ASIC designers when selecting an appropriate algorithm while respecting requirements and design constraints.