Source author record

Magdalena Nowak

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.DS math.GN math.MG

Catalog footprint

Research overview

8works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2015arXiv

Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

In this paper, we deal with the part of Fractal Theory related to finite families of (weak) contractions, called iterated function systems (IFS, herein). An attractor is a compact set which remains invariant for such a family. Thus, we consider spaces homeomorphic to attractors of either IFS or weak IFS, as well, which we will refer to as Banach and topological fractals, respectively. We present a collection of counterexamples in order to show that all the presented definitions are essential, though they are not equivalent in general.

preprint2015arXiv

Counterexamples in theory of fractal dimension for fractal structures

Fractal dimension constitutes the main tool to test for fractal patterns in Euclidean contexts. For this purpose, it is always used the box dimension, since it is easy to calculate, though the Hausdorff dimension, which is the oldest and also the most accurate fractal dimension, presents the best analytical properties. Additionally, fractal structures provide an appropriate topological context where new models of fractal dimension for a fractal structure could be developed in order to generalize the classical models of fractal dimension. In this paper, we provide some counterexamples regarding these new models of fractal dimension in order to show the reader how they behave mathematically with respect to the classical models, and also to point out which features of such models can be exploited to powerful effect in applications.

preprint2015arXiv

Detecting topological and Banach fractals among zero-dimensional spaces

A topological space $X$ is called a topological fractal if $X=\bigcup_{f\in\mathcal F}f(X)$ for a finite system $\mathcal F$ of continuous self-maps of $X$ , which is topologically contracting in the sense that for every open cover $\mathcal U$ of $X$ there is a number $n\in\mathbb N$ such that for any functions $f_1,\dots,f_n\in \mathcal F$ , the set $f_1\circ\dots\circ f_n(X)$ is contained in some set $U\in\mathcal U$ . If, in addition, all functions $f\in\mathcal F$ have Lipschitz constant $<1$ with respect to some metric generating the topology of $X$ , then the space $X$ is called a Banach fractal. It is known that each topological fractal is compact and metrizable. We prove that a zero-dimensional compact metrizable space $X$ is a topological fractal if and only if $X$ is a Banach fractal if and only if $X$ is either uncountable or $X$ is countable and its scattered height $\hbar(X)$ is a successor ordinal. For countable compact spaces this classification was recently proved by M.Nowak.

preprint2014arXiv

Contractive function systems, their attractors and metrization

In this paper we study the Hutchinson-Barnsley theory of fractals in the setting of multimetric spaces (which are sets endowed with point separating families of pseudometrics) and in the setting of topological spaces. We find natural connections between these two approaches.

preprint2013arXiv

The shark teeth is a topological IFS-attractor

We show that the space called shark teeth is a topological IFS-attractor, that is for every open cover of $X=\bigcup_{i=1}^nf_i(X)$ , its image under every suitable large composition from the family of continuous functions $\{f_1,...,f_n\}$ lies in some set from the cover. In particular, there exists a space which is not homeomorphic to any IFS-attractor but is a topological IFS-attractor.

preprint2013arXiv

Topological classification of scattered IFS-attractors

We study countable compact spaces as potential attractors of iterated function systems. We give an example of a convergent sequence in the real line which is not an IFS-attractor and for each countable ordinal $δ$ we show that a countable compact space of height $δ+1$ can be embedded in the real line so that it becomes the attractor of an IFS. On the other hand, we show that a scattered compact metric space of limit height is never an IFS-attractor.

preprint2012arXiv

A class of continua that are not attractors of any IFS

This paper presents a sufficient condition for a continuum in $R^n$ to be embeddable in $R^n$ in such a way that its image is not an attractor of any iterated function system. An example of a continuum in $R^2$ that is not an attractor of any weakly contracting iterated function system is also given.

preprint2011arXiv

A 1-dimensional Peano continuum which is not an IFS attractor

Answering an old question of M.Hata, we construct an example of a 1-dimensional Peano continuum which is not homeomorphic to an attractor of IFS.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Magdalena Nowak

Research overview

Is this your work?

8 publications

Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

Counterexamples in theory of fractal dimension for fractal structures

Detecting topological and Banach fractals among zero-dimensional spaces

Contractive function systems, their attractors and metrization

The shark teeth is a topological IFS-attractor

Topological classification of scattered IFS-attractors

A class of continua that are not attractors of any IFS

A 1-dimensional Peano continuum which is not an IFS attractor

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview