BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

M. Parsi Mood

M. Parsi Mood contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COgr-qc

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Exact general relativistic lensing versus thin lens approximation: the crucial role of the void

We have used an exact general relativistic model structure within a FRW cosmological background based on a LTB metric to study the gravitational lensing of a cosmological structure. The integration of the geodesic equations turned out to be a delicate task. We realized that the use of the rank 8(7) and 10(11) Runge-Kutta numerical method leads to a numerical effect and is therefore unreliable. The so-called semi-implicit Rosenbrock method, however, turned out to be a viable integration method for our problem. The deviation angle calculated by the integration of the geodesic equations for different density profiles of the model structure was then compared to those of the corresponding thin lens approximation. Using the familiar NFW density profile, it is shown that independent of the truncation details the thin lens approximation differ substantially from the exact relativistic calculation. The difference in the deflection angle for different impact parameters may be up to about 30 percent. However, using the modified NFW density profile with a void before going over to the FRW background, as required by an exact general relativistic model, the thin lens approximation coincides almost exactly with the general relativistic calculation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Gravitational Lensing by a structure in a cosmological background

We use an exact general relativistic model structure within an FRW cosmological background based on a LTB metric to study the gravitational lensing by a cosmological and dynamical structure. Using different density profiles for the model structure, the deviation angle and the time delay through the gravitational lensing has been studied by solving the geodesic equations. The results of these exact calculations have been compared to the thin lens approximation. We have shown that the result for the thin lens approximation based on a modified NFW density profile with a void before going over to the FRW background matches very well with the exact general relativistic calculations. However, the thin lens approximation based on a normal NFW profile does differ from the exact relativistic calculation. The difference is more the less compact the structure is. We have also looked at the impact of our calculation on the observational interpretation of arcs in the case of strong lensing and also the reduced shear in the case of weak lensing. No significant difference has been seen in the data available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Do we know the mass of a black hole? Mass of some cosmological black hole models

Using a cosmological black hole model proposed recently, we have calculated the quasi-local mass of a collapsing structure within a cosmological setting due to different definitions put forward in the last decades to see how similar or different they are. It has been shown that the mass within the horizon follows the familiar Brown-York behavior. It increases, however, outside the horizon again after a short decrease, in contrast to the Schwarzschild case. Further away, near the void, outside the collapsed region, and where the density reaches the background minimum, all the mass definitions roughly coincide. They differ, however, substantially far from it. Generically, we are faced with three different Brown-York mass maxima: near the horizon, around the void between the overdensity region and the background, and another at cosmological distances corresponding to the cosmological horizon. While the latter two maxima are always present, the horizon mass maxima is absent before the onset of the central singularity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access