Source author record

M. Ginolin

M. Ginolin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Study of the anisotropy of cosmic expansion on ZTF type Iasupernovae simulations

The cosmological principle assumes the isotropy of the Universe at large scales. It is a foundational assumption in the $Λ$CDM model, which is the current standard model of cosmology. Recent tensions give legitimacy to investigating the possibility of anisotropies in the Universe. The large sky coverage achieved by the Zwicky Transient Facility survey (ZTF) allows us to test the veracity of the cosmological principle using observations of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). In this article, we develop a methodology to measure potential anisotropies in the Hubble constant $H_0$. We test our method on realistic simulations of the second data release (DR2) of ZTF SNe Ia in which we introduce a dipole. We develop an unbiased method both to introduce a dipole in the simulations and to recover it. We test a potential $H_0$ dependency of our method while varying the dipole amplitude. We analyse the impact of introducing large-scale structures in the simulations and the efficiency of using a volume-limited sample, which is an unbiased subsample of the ZTF SNe Ia sample. Finally, we build an error model applied to the recovered dipole amplitude ($ΔH_0$) and its direction ($α_0$, $δ_0$). Our analysis allows us to recover a dipole with an error on the amplitude of $0.33\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, and uncertainties of $3.4^\circ$ and $6.1^\circ$ on the right ascension and declination, respectively, for an initial dipole amplitude of $ΔH_0 = 3\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$. The resulting dipole is independent of the chosen $H_0$ value and sky coverage. This paper paves the way for a future precise ZTF dipole investigation.

preprint2025arXiv

ZTF SN Ia DR2 follow-up: Exploring the origin of the Type Ia supernova host galaxy step through Si II velocities

The relationship between Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and their host galaxy stellar masses is well documented. In particular, Hubble residuals display a luminosity shift based on host mass, known as the mass step, which is often used as an extra correction in the standardisation of SN Ia luminosities. Here we investigate Hubble residuals and the mass step in the context of Si II $λ6355$ velocities, using 277 near-peak SNe Ia from ZTF DR2. We divide the sample into high-velocity (HV) and normal-velocity (NV) SNe Ia, separated at 12,000 km/s, resulting in 70 HV and 207 NV objects. We then examine links between Si II $λ$6355 velocities, light-curve stretch $x_{1}$, colour $c$, and host properties to explore potential environmental and/or progenitor-related effects. Although we only find a marginal difference between the Hubble residuals of HV and NV SNe Ia, the NV mass step is $0.149 \pm 0.024$ mag ($6.3σ$), while HV SNe Ia show $0.046 \pm 0.041$ mag ($1.1σ$), consistent with zero. The NV-HV mass-step difference is $\sim 2.2σ$. The clearest subtype difference is seen in central regions ($d_{DLR} < 1$), where NV SNe Ia show a strong mass step but HV SNe Ia none, yielding a $3.1-3.6σ$ difference. A host-colour step appears for both: NV $0.142 \pm 0.024$ mag ($5.9σ$) and HV $0.158 \pm 0.042$ mag ($3.8σ$). Overall, NV and HV colour steps are consistent. HV SNe Ia show modest ($\sim 2.5$-$3σ$) steps in outer regions ($d_{DLR} > 1$), while NV SNe show stronger environmental trends. Thus, NV SNe Ia appear more environmentally sensitive, especially in central, likely metal-rich and older regions, while HV SNe Ia show weaker, subset-dependent trends, and applying a universal mass-step correction could introduce biases. Refined classifications or environment-dependent factors may improve future cosmological analyses beyond standard $x_{1}$ and $c$ cuts.