Researcher profile

M. Ciavarella

M. Ciavarella contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

On the application of fracture mechanics mixed-mode models of sliding with friction and adhesion

As recently suggested in an interestring and stimulating paper by Menga, Carbone & Dini (MCD), applying fracture mechanics energy concepts for the case of a sliding adhesive contact, imposing also the shear stress is constant at the interface and equal to a material constant (as it seems in experiments), leads to a increase of contact area which instead is never observed. We add that the rigorous MCD theory also predict a size effect and hence a distortion of the JKR curve during sliding which is also not observed in experiments. Finally, a simpler example with the pure mode I contact case, leads in the MCD theory to an unbounded contact area, which is difficult to interpret, rather than a perhaps more correct limit of the Maugis-Dugdale solution for the adhesive sphere when Tabor parameter is zero, that is DMT's solution. We discuss therefore the implications of the MCD theory, although they may be rather academic: recent semi-empirical models, with an appropriate choice of the empirical parameters, seem more promising and robust in modelling actual experiments.

preprint2019arXiv

The interaction of frictional slip and adhesion for a stiff sphere on a compliant substrate

How friction affects adhesion is addressed. The problem is considered in the context of a very stiff sphere adhering to a compliant, isotropic, linear elastic substrate, and experiencing adhesion and frictional slip relative to each other. The adhesion is considered to be driven by very large attractive tractions between the sphere and the substrate that can act only at very small distances between them. As a consequence, the adhesion behavior can be represented by the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts model, and this is assumed to prevail also when frictional slip is occurring. Frictional slip is considered to be resisted by a uniform, constant shear traction at the slipping interface, a model that is considered to be valid for small asperities and for compliant elastomers in contact with stiff material. A model for the interaction of friction and adhesion, known to agree with some experimental data, is utilized. This model is due to Johnson, and its adhesion-friction interaction is assumed to stem, upon shrinkage of the contact area, from a postulated reversible energy release associated with frictional slip. This behavior is considered to arise from surface microstructures generated or eliminated by frictional slip, where these microstructures store some elastic strain energy in a reversible manner. The associated reversible energy release rate is derived from the energy exchanges that occur in the system. The Johnson model, and an asymptotic analysis of it for small amounts of frictional slip, is shown to be consistent with the reversible energy release rate that we identify.

preprint2013arXiv

A critical assessment on Kassapoglou's statistical model for composites fatigue

Kassapoglou recently proposed a model for fatigue of composite materials which seems to suggest that fatigue SN curve can be entirely predicted on the basis of the statistical distribution of static strengths. The original abstract writes "Expressions for the cycles to failure as a function of R ratio are derived. These expressions do not require any curve fitting and do not involve any experimentally determined parameters. The fatigue predictions do not require any fatigue tests for calibration". These surprisingly ambitious claims and attractive results deserve careful scrutiny. We contend that the results seem to be due to a number of approximations and incorrect derivations, and one particular misleading assumption, which make the model not conform to a fatigue testing in a given specimen with resulting SN curve distribution. The quantitative agreement of some predictions (the scatter of distribution of fatigue lives being close to the mode value found in typical composites of aeronautical interest in the large Navy database) should not motivate any enthusiasm. It is believed that a proper statistical treatment of the fatigue process should not make wear-out constants disappear, and hence the SN curves would depend on them, and not just on scatter of static data. These serious concerns explain the large discrepancies found by 3 independent studies which tried to apply Kassapoglou's model to composite fatigue data, and to other well known results.