Researcher profile

M. Chávez

M. Chávez contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Disentangling the parameter space: The role of planet multiplicity in triggering dynamical instabilities on planetary systems around white dwarfs

Planets orbiting intermediate and low-mass stars are in jeopardy as their stellar hosts evolve to white dwarfs (WDs) because the dynamics of the planetary system changes due to the increase of the planet:star mass ratio after stellar mass-loss. In order to understand how the planet multiplicity affects the dynamical stability of post-main sequence (MS) systems, we perform thousands of N-body simulations involving planetary multiplicity as the variable and with a controlled physical and orbital parameter space: equal-mass planets; the same orbital spacing between adjacent planet's pairs; and orbits with small eccentricities and inclinations. We evolve the host star from the MS to the WD phase following the system dynamics for 10 Gyr. We find that the fraction of dynamically active simulations on the WD phase for two-planet systems is $10.2^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$-$25.2^{+2.5}_{-2.2}$ $\%$ and increases to $33.6^{+2.3}_{-2.2}$-$74.1^{+3.7}_{-4.6}$ $\%$ for the six-planet systems, where the ranges cover different ranges of initial orbital separations. Our simulations show that the more planets the system has, the more systems become unstable when the star becomes a WD, regardless of the planet masses and range of separations. Additional results evince that simulations with low-mass planets (1, 10 $\mathrm{M_\oplus}$) lose at most two planets, have a large fraction of systems undergoing orbit crossing without planet losses, and are dynamically active for Gyr time-scales on the WD's cooling track. On the other hand, systems with high-mass planets (100, 1000 $\mathrm{M_\oplus}$) lose up to five planets, preferably by ejections, and become unstable in the first few hundred Myr after the formation of the WD.

preprint2020arXiv

Dynamical evolution of two-planet systems and its connection with white dwarf atmospheric pollution

Asteroid material is detected in white dwarfs (WDs) as atmospheric pollution by metals, in the form of gas/dust discs, or in photometric transits. Within the current paradigm, minor bodies need to be scattered, most likely by planets, into highly eccentric orbits where the material gets disrupted by tidal forces and then accreted onto the star. This can occur through a planet-planet scattering process triggered by the stellar mass loss during the post main-sequence evolution of planetary systems. So far, studies of the $N$-body dynamics of this process have used artificial planetary system architectures built ad hoc. In this work, we attempt to go a step further and study the dynamical instability provided by more restrictive systems, that, at the same time allow us an exploration of a wider parameter space: the hundreds of multiple planetary systems found around main-sequence (MS) stars. We find that most of our simulated systems remain stable during the MS, Red and Asymptotic Giant Branch and for several Gyr into the WD phases of the host star. Overall, only $\approx$ 2.3$\%$ of the simulated systems lose a planet on the WD as a result of dynamical instability. If the instabilities take place during the WD phase most of them result in planet ejections with just 5 planetary configurations ending as a collision of a planet with the WD. Finally 3.2$\%$ of the simulated systems experience some form of orbital scattering or orbit crossing that could contribute to the pollution at a sustained rate if planetesimals are present in the same system.