BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

M. Brož

M. Brož contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Discovery of an asteroid family linked to (22) Kalliope and its moon Linus

According to adaptive-optics observations by Ferrais et al., (22) Kalliope is a 150-km, dense and differentiated body. Here, we interpret (22) Kalliope in the context of bodies in its surroundings. While there is a known moon Linus, with a 5:1 size ratio, no family has been reported in the literature, which is in contradiction with the existence of the moon. Using the hierarchical clustering method (HCM) along with physical data, we identified the Kalliope family. Previously, it was associated to (7481) San Marcello. We then used various models (N-body, Monte-Carlo, SPH) of its orbital and collisional evolution, including the break-up of the parent body, to estimate the dynamical age of the family and address its link to Linus. The best-fit age is (900+-100) My according to our collisional model, in agreement with the position of (22) Kalliope, which was modified by chaotic diffusion due to 4-1-1 three-body resonance with Jupiter and Saturn. It seems possible to create Linus and the Kalliope family at the same time, although our SPH simulations show a variety of outcomes, for both satellite size and the family size-frequency distribution. The shape of (22) Kalliope itself was most likely affected by gravitational reaccumulation of `streams', which creates characteristic hills observed on the surface. If the body was differentiated, its internal structure is surely asymmetric.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

SPH simulations of high-speed collisions between asteroids and comets

We studied impact processes by means of smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations. The method was applied to modeling formation of main-belt families during the cometary bombardment (either early or late, ${\sim}\,3.85\,{\rm Gy}$ ago). If asteroids were bombarded by comets, as predicted by the Nice model, hundreds of asteroid families (catastrophic disruptions of diameter $D \ge 100\,{\rm km}$ bodies) should have been created, but the observed number is only 20. Therefore we computed a standard set of 125 simulations of collisions between representative $D = 100\,{\rm km}$ asteroids and high-speed icy projectiles (comets). According to our results, the largest remnant mass $M_{\rm lr}$ is similar as in low-speed collisions, due to appropriate scaling with the effective strength $Q_{\rm eff}$, but the largest fragment mass $M_{\rm lf}$ exhibits systematic differences - it is typically smaller for craterings and bigger for super-catastrophic events. This trend does not, however, explain the non-existence of old families. The respective parametric relations can be used in other statistical (Monte-Carlo) models to better understand collisions between asteroidal and cometary populations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Observed tidal evolution of Kleopatra's outer satellite

The orbit of the outer satellite Alexhelios of (216) Kleopatra is already constrained by adaptive-optics astrometry, obtained with the VLT/SPHERE instrument. However, there is also a preceding occultation event in 1980 attributed to this satellite. Hereinafter, we try to link all observations, spanning 1980--2018. We find the nominal orbit exhibits an unexplained shift by $+60^\circ$ in the true longitude. Using both periodogram analysis and an $\ell = 10$ multipole model suitable for the motion of mutually interacting moons about the irregular body, we confirmed that it is not possible to adjust the respective osculating period $P_2$. Instead, we were forced to use a model with tidal dissipation (and increasing orbital periods) to explain the shift. We also analyzed light curves, spanning 1977--2021, and searched for the expected spin deceleration of Kleopatra. According to our best-fit model, the observed period rate is $\dot P_2 = (1.8\pm 0.1)\cdot 10^{-8}\,{\rm d}\,{\rm d}^{-1}$ and the corresponding time lag $Δt_2 = 42\,{\rm s}$ of tides, for the assumed value of the Love number $k_2 = 0.3$. It is the first detection of tidal evolution for moons orbiting 100-km asteroids. The corresponding dissipation factor $Q$ is comparable with other terrestrial bodies, albeit at a higher loading frequency $2|ω-n|$. We also predict a secular evolution of the inner moon, $\dot P_1 = 5.0\cdot 10^{-8}$, as well as a spin deceleration of Kleopatra, $\dot P_0 = 1.9\cdot 10^{-12}$. In alternative models, with moons captured in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance or more massive moons, the respective values of $Δt_2$ are a factor of 2--3 lower. Future astrometric observations by direct imaging or occultations should allow to distinguish between these models, which is important for the internal structure and mechanical properties of (216) Kleopatra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optically thin circumstellar medium in $β$ Lyr A system

beta Lyr A is a complex binary system with an extensive observational dataset: light curves (from FUV to FIR), interferometric squared visibility, closure phase, triple product measurements, spectral-energy distribution (SED), high-resolution spectroscopy, differential visibility amplitude, and also differential phase. In particular, we use spectra from Ondrejov 2m telescope from 2013 to 2015, to measure the emission in Halpha, HeI, SiII, NeI, or CII lines, and differential interferometry by CHARA/VEGA from the 2013 campaign to measure wavelength-dependent sizes across Halpha and HeI 6678. This allows us to constrain not only optically thick objects (primary, secondary, accretion disk), but also optically thin objects (disk atmosphere, jets, shell). We extended our modelling tool Pyshellspec (based on Shellspec; a 1D LTE radiative transfer code) to include all new observables, to compute differential visibilities/phases, to perform a Doppler tomography, and to determine a joint chi^2 metric. After an optimisation of 38 free parameters, we derive a robust model of the beta Lyr A system. According to the model, the emission is formed in an extended atmosphere of the disk, two perpendicular jets expanding at ~700 km s^-1, and a symmetric shell with the radius ~70 R_S. The spectroscopy indicates a low abundance of carbon, 10^-2 of the solar value. We also quantify systematic differences between datasets and discuss alternative models, with higher resolution, additional asymmetries, or He-rich abundance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access