Researcher profile

M. A. De Leo

M. A. De Leo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Frontier Fields : Combining HST, VLT and Spitzer data to explore the $z$$\sim$8 Universe behind the lensing cluster MACS0416$-$2403

(Abridged) The HST Frontier Fields project started at the end of 2013 with the aim of providing extremely deep images of 6 massive galaxy clusters. One of the main goals of this program is to push several telescopes to their limits in order to provide the best current view of the earliest stages of the Universe. We present a detailed analysis of $z$$\sim$8 objects behind the HFFs lensing cluster, MACS0416-2403, combining 0.3-1.6 $μ$m imaging from HST, ground-based $K_s$ imaging from VLT HAWK-I, and 3.6 $μ$m and 4.5 $μ$m Spitzer Space Telescope. We apply the classical Lyman Break technique, combining non-detection criteria and color-selection. In order to avoid contamination by mid-$z$ interlopers, we require a strong break between optical and near infrared data. The luminosity function at $z$$\sim$8 is computed using a MC method taking advantage of the SED-fitting results. A piece of cautionary information is gleaned from new deep optical photometry of a previously identified $z$$\sim$8 galaxy in this cluster, which is now firmly detected as a mid-$z$ interloper with a strong $\approx1.5$ mag Balmer break (between F606W and F125W). Using the SED of this interloper, we estimate the contamination rate of our MACS0416$-$2403 sample, as well as for previous samples in Abell 2744 based on HFF data. Our selection recovers 4 robust objects with m$_{F160W}$ ranging from 26.0 to 27.9 AB and located in modest amplification regions ($μ<$2.4). Two of the objects display a secondary break between the IRAC 3.6 $μ$m and 4.5 $μ$m bands which could be associated to the Balmer break or emission lines at $z$$\sim$8. The candidates generally have star formation rates around $\sim$10 M$_{\odot}$/yr and sizes ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 kpc, in good agreement with previous observations and expectations for objects in the early Universe.

preprint2013arXiv

Filter Induced Bias in Lyα Emitter Surveys: A Comparison Between Standard and Tunable Filters. Gran Telescopio Canarias Preliminary Results

Lyman-alpha emitter (LAE) surveys have successfully used the excess in a narrow-band filter compared to a nearby broad-band image to find candidates. However, the odd spectral energy distribution (SED) of LAEs combined with the instrumental profile have important effects on the properties of the candidate samples extracted from these surveys. We investigate the effect of the bandpass width and the transmission profile of the narrow-band filters used for extracting LAE candidates at redshifts z ~ 6.5 through Monte Carlo simulations, and we present pilot observations to test the performance of tunable filters to find LAEs and other emission-line candidates. We compare the samples obtained using a narrow ideal-rectangular-filter, the Subaru NB921 narrow-band filter, and sweeping across a wavelength range using the ultra-narrow-band tunable filters of the instrument OSIRIS, installed at the 10.4m Gran Telescopio Canarias. We use this instrument for extracting LAE candidates from a small set of real observations. Broad-band data from the Subaru, HST and Spitzer databases were used for fiting SEDs to calculate photometric redshifts and to identify interlopers. Narrow-band surveys are very efficient to find LAEs in large sky areas, but the samples obtained are not evenly distributed in redshift along the filter bandpass, and the number of LAEs with equivalent widths < 60 angstroms can be underestimated. These biased results do not appear in samples obtained using ultra-narrow-band tunable filters. However, the field size of tunable filters is restricted because of the variation of the effective wavelength across the image. Thus narrow-band and ultra-narrow-band surveys are complementary strategies to investigate high-redshift LAEs.

preprint2009arXiv

Looking for the first galaxies: Lensing or blank fields?

The identification and study of the first galaxies remains one of the most exciting topics in observational cosmology. The determination of the best possible observing strategies is a very important choice in order to build up a representative sample of spectroscopically confirmed sources at high-z (z>7), beyond the limits of present-day observations. This paper is intended to precisely adress the relative efficiency of lensing and blank fields in the identification and study of galaxies at 6<z<12. The detection efficiency and field-to-field variance are estimated from direct simulations of both blank and lensing fields observations. The presence of a strong-lensing cluster along the line of sight has a dramatic effect on the number of observed sources, with a positive magnification bias in typical ground-based ``shallow&#39;&#39; surveys (AB<~25.5). The positive magnification bias increases with the redshift of sources and decreases with both depth of the survey and the size of the surveyed area. The maximum efficiency is reached for lensing clusters at z~0.1-0.3. Observing blank fields in shallow surveys is particularly inefficient as compared to lensing fields if the UV LF for LBGs is strongly evolving at z>~7. Also in this case, the number of z>8 sources expected at the typical depth of JWST (AB~28-29) is much higher in lensing than in blank fields (e.g. a factor of ~10 for AB<~28). Blank field surveys with a large field of view are needed to prove the bright end of the LF at z>6-7, whereas lensing clusters are particularly useful for exploring the mid to faint end of the LF.