Researcher profile

Luke Postle

Luke Postle contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

An Improved Bound for the Linear Arboricity Conjecture

In 1980, Akiyama, Exoo and Harary posited the Linear Arboricity Conjecture which states that any graph $G$ of maximum degree $Δ$ can be decomposed into at most $\left\lceil \fracΔ{2}\right\rceil$ linear forests. (A forest is linear if all of its components are paths.) In 1988, Alon proved the conjecture holds asymptotically. The current best bound is due to Ferber, Fox and Jain from 2020 who showed that $\fracΔ{2}+ O(Δ^{.661})$ suffices for large enough $Δ$. Here, we show that $G$ admits a decomposition into at most $\fracΔ{2}+ 3\sqrtΔ \log^4 Δ$ linear forests provided $Δ$ is large enough. Moreover, our result also holds in the more general list setting, where edges have (possibly different) sets of permissible linear forests. Thus our bound also holds for the List Linear Arboricity Conjecture which was only recently shown to hold asymptotically by Kim and the second author. Indeed, our proof method ties together the Linear Arboricity Conjecture and the well-known List Colouring Conjecture; consequently, our error term for the Linear Arboricity Conjecture matches the best known error-term for the List Colouring Conjecture due to Molloy and Reed from 2000. This follows as we make two copies of every colour and then seek a proper edge colouring where we avoid bicoloured cycles between a colour and its copy; we achieve this via a clever modification of the nibble method.

preprint2022arXiv

An even better Density Increment Theorem and its application to Hadwiger's Conjecture

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $(t-1)$-colorable for every $t\ge 1$. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor has average degree $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ and hence is $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$-colorable. Recently, Norin, Song and the author showed that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> 1/4$, making the first improvement on the order of magnitude of the $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ bound. More recently, the author showed that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t (\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> 0$; more specifically, they are $t \cdot 2^{ O((\log \log t)^{2/3}) }$-colorable. In combination with that work, we show in this paper that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t (\log \log t)^{6})$-colorable.

preprint2022arXiv

Further progress towards Hadwiger's conjecture

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $(t-1)$-colorable for every $t\ge 1$. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor has average degree $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ and hence is $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$-colorable. Recently, Norin, Song and the author showed that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> 1/4$, making the first improvement on the order of magnitude of the $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ bound. Building on that work, we show in this paper that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t (\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> 0$. More specifically in conjunction with another paper by the author, they are $O(t \cdot (\log \log t)^{18})$-colorable.

preprint2022arXiv

Halfway to Hadwiger's Conjecture

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $(t-1)$-colorable for every $t\ge 1$. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor has average degree $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ and hence is $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$-colorable. Very recently, Norin and Song proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^{0.354})$-colorable. Improving on the second part of their argument, we prove that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> \frac{1}{4}$.

preprint2020arXiv

Breaking the degeneracy barrier for coloring graphs with no $K_t$ minor

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $(t-1)$-colorable for every $t\geq 1$. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor has average degree $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ and hence is $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$-colorable. We show that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> 1/4$, making the first improvement on the order of magnitude of the Kostochka-Thomason bound.

preprint2020arXiv

Connectivity and choosability of graphs with no $K_t$ minor

In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $(t-1)$-colorable for every $t\ge 1$. While Hadwiger's conjecture does not hold for list-coloring, the linear weakening is conjectured to be true. In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor has average degree $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$ and thus is $O(t\sqrt{\log t})$-list-colorable. Recently, the authors and Song proved that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-colorable for every $β> \frac 1 4$. Here, we build on that result to show that every graph with no $K_t$ minor is $O(t(\log t)^β)$-list-colorable for every $β> \frac 1 4$. Our main new tool is an upper bound on the number of vertices in highly connected $K_t$-minor-free graphs: We prove that for every $β> \frac 1 4$, every $Ω(t(\log t)^β)$-connected graph with no $K_t$ minor has $O(t (\log t)^{7/4})$ vertices.