Source author record

Luke Blackbourn

Luke Blackbourn appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2009arXiv

Number of degrees of freedom of two-dimensional turbulence

We derive upper bounds for the number of degrees of freedom of two-dimensional Navier--Stokes turbulence freely decaying from a smooth initial vorticity field $ω(x,y,0)=ω_0$. This number, denoted by $N$, is defined as the minimum dimension such that for $n\ge N$, arbitrary $n$-dimensional balls in phase space centred on the solution trajectory $ω(x,y,t)$, for $t>0$, contract under the dynamics of the system linearized about $ω(x,y,t)$. In other words, $N$ is the minimum number of greatest Lyapunov exponents whose sum becomes negative. It is found that $N\le C_1R_e$ when the phase space is endowed with the energy norm, and $N\le C_2R_e(1+\ln R_e)^{1/3}$ when the phase space is endowed with the enstrophy norm. Here $C_1$ and $C_2$ are constant and $R_e$ is the Reynolds number defined in terms of $ω_0$, the system length scale, and the viscosity $ν$. The linear (or nearly linear) dependence of $N$ on $R_e$ is consistent with the estimate for the number of active modes deduced from a recent mathematical bound for the viscous dissipation wave number. This result is in a sharp contrast to the forced case, for which well-known estimates for the Hausdorff dimension $D_H$ of the global attractor scale highly superlinearly with $ν^{-1}$. We argue that the "extra" dependence of $D_H$ on $ν^{-1}$ is not an intrinsic property of the turbulent dynamics. Rather, it is a "removable artifact," brought about by the use of a time-independent forcing as a model for energy and enstrophy injection that drives the turbulence.