BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lukas Haschke

Lukas Haschke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and Languagemath.COFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

m-Nearly k-Universal Words -- Investigating Simon Congruence

Determining the index of the Simon congruence is a long outstanding open problem. Two words $u$ and $v$ are called Simon congruent if they have the same set of scattered factors, which are parts of the word in the correct order but not necessarily consecutive, e.g., $\mathtt{oath}$ is a scattered factor of $\mathtt{logarithm}$. Following the idea of scattered factor $k$-universality, we investigate $m$-nearly $k$-universality, i.e., words where $m$ scattered factors of length $k$ are absent, w.r.t. Simon congruence. We present a full characterisation as well as the index of the congruence for $m=1$. For $m\neq 1$, we show some results if in addition $w$ is $(k-1)$-universal as well as some further insights for different $m$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Self Shuffle Language

The shuffle product \(u\shuffle v\) of two words \(u\) and \(v\) is the set of all words which can be obtained by interleaving \(u\) and \(v\). Motivated by the paper \emph{The Shuffle Product: New Research Directions} by Restivo (2015) we investigate a special case of the shuffle product. In this work we consider the shuffle of a word with itself called the \emph{self shuffle} or \emph{shuffle square}, showing first that the self shuffle language and the shuffle of the language are in general different sets. We prove that the language of all words arising as a self shuffle of some word is context sensitive but not context free. Furthermore, we show that the self shuffle \(w \shuffle w\) uniquely determines \(w\).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Blocksequences of k-local Words

The locality of words is a relatively young structural complexity measure, introduced by Day et al. in 2017 in order to define classes of patterns with variables which can be matched in polynomial time. The main tool used to compute the locality of a word is called marking sequence: an ordering of the distinct letters occurring in the respective order. Once a marking sequence is defined, the letters of the word are marked in steps: in the ith marking step, all occurrences of the ith letter of the marking sequence are marked. As such, after each marking step, the word can be seen as a sequence of blocks of marked letters separated by blocks of non-marked letters. By keeping track of the evolution of the marked blocks of the word through the marking defined by a marking sequence, one defines the blocksequence of the respective marking sequence. We first show that the words sharing the same blocksequence are only loosely connected, so we consider the stronger notion of extended blocksequence, which stores additional information on the form of each single marked block. In this context, we present a series of combinatorial results for words sharing the extended blocksequence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access