BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lukas Fleischer

Lukas Fleischer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

New Bounds on Antipowers in Words

Fici et al. defined a word to be a k-power if it is the concatenation of k consecutive identical blocks, and an r-antipower if it is the concatenation of r pairwise distinct blocks of the same size. They defined N (k, r) as the smallest l such that every binary word of length l contains either a k-power or an r-antipower. In this note we obtain some new upper and lower bounds on N (k, r). We also consider avoiding 3-antipowers and 4-antipowers over larger alphabets, and obtain a lower bound for N (k, 5) in the binary case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The State Complexity of Lexicographically Smallest Words and Computing Successors

Given a regular language L over an ordered alphabet $Σ$, the set of lexicographically smallest (resp., largest) words of each length is itself regular. Moreover, there exists an unambiguous finite-state transducer that, on a given word w, outputs the length-lexicographically smallest word larger than w (henceforth called the L-successor of w). In both cases, naive constructions result in an exponential blowup in the number of states. We prove that if L is recognized by a DFA with n states, then $2^{Θ(\sqrt{n \log n})}$ states are sufficient for a DFA to recognize the subset S(L) of L composed of its lexicographically smallest words. We give a matching lower bound that holds even if S(L) is represented as an NFA. We then show that the same upper and lower bounds hold for an unambiguous finite-state transducer that computes L-successors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access