Researcher profile

Luciano Gualà

Luciano Gualà contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Sparse Temporal Spanners with Low Stretch

A temporal graph is an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ along with a function that assigns a time-label to each edge in $E$. A path in $G$ with non-decreasing time-labels is called temporal path and the distance from $u$ to $v$ is the minimum length (i.e., the number of edges) of a temporal path from $u$ to $v$. A temporal $α$-spanner of $G$ is a (temporal) subgraph $H$ that preserves the distances between any pair of vertices in $V$, up to a multiplicative stretch factor of $α$. The size of $H$ is the number of its edges. In this work we study the size-stretch trade-offs of temporal spanners. We show that temporal cliques always admit a temporal $(2k-1)-$spanner with $\tilde{O}(kn^{1+\frac{1}{k}})$ edges, where $k>1$ is an integer parameter of choice. Choosing $k=\lfloor\log n\rfloor$, we obtain a temporal $O(\log n)$-spanner with $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges that has almost the same size (up to logarithmic factors) as the temporal spanner in [Casteigts et al., JCSS 2021] which only preserves temporal connectivity. We then consider general temporal graphs. Since $Ω(n^2)$ edges might be needed by any connectivity-preserving temporal subgraph [Axiotis et al., ICALP'16], we focus on approximating distances from a single source. We show that $\tilde{O}(n/\log(1+\varepsilon))$ edges suffice to obtain a stretch of $(1+\varepsilon)$, for any small $\varepsilon>0$. This result is essentially tight since there are temporal graphs for which any temporal subgraph preserving exact distances from a single-source must use $Ω(n^2)$ edges. We extend our analysis to prove an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(n^2/β)$ on the size of any temporal $β$-additive spanner, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors. Finally, we investigate how the lifetime of $G$, i.e., the number of its distinct time-labels, affects the trade-off between the size and the stretch of a temporal spanner.

preprint2020arXiv

Cutting Bamboo Down to Size

This paper studies the problem of programming a robotic panda gardener to keep a bamboo garden from obstructing the view of the lake by your house. The garden consists of $n$ bamboo stalks with known daily growth rates and the gardener can cut at most one bamboo per day. As a computer scientist, you found out that this problem has already been formalized in [Gąsieniec et al., SOFSEM&#39;17] as the Bamboo Garden Trimming (BGT) problem, where the goal is that of computing a perpetual schedule (i.e., the sequence of bamboos to cut) for the robotic gardener to follow in order to minimize the makespan, i.e., the maximum height ever reached by a bamboo. Two natural strategies are Reduce-Max and Reduce-Fastest(x). Reduce-Max trims the tallest bamboo of the day, while Reduce-Fastest(x) trims the fastest growing bamboo among the ones that are taller than $x$. It is known that Reduce-Max and Reduce-Fastest(x) achieve a makespan of $O(\log n)$ and $4$ for the best choice of $x=2$, respectively. We prove the first constant upper bound of $9$ for Reduce-Max and improve the one for Reduce-Fastest(x) to $\frac{3+\sqrt{5}}{2} < 2.62$ for $x=1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}$. Another critical aspect stems from the fact that your robotic gardener has a limited amount of processing power and memory. It is then important for the algorithm to be able to quickly determine the next bamboo to cut while requiring at most linear space. We formalize this aspect as the problem of designing a Trimming Oracle data structure, and we provide three efficient Trimming Oracles implementing different perpetual schedules, including those produced by Reduce-Max and Reduce-Fastest(x).