BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Lucia D. Penso

Lucia D. Penso appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A bound on the dissociation number

The dissociation number ${\rm diss}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the maximum order of a set of vertices of $G$ inducing a subgraph that is of maximum degree at most $1$. Computing the dissociation number of a given graph is algorithmically hard even when restricted to subcubic bipartite graphs. For a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, $k$ components, and $c_1$ induced cycles of length $1$ modulo $3$, we show ${\rm diss}(G)\geq n-\frac{1}{3}\Big(m+k+c_1\Big)$. Furthermore, we characterize the extremal graphs in which every two cycles are vertex-disjoint.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Relating dissociation, independence, and matchings

A dissociation set in a graph is a set of vertices inducing a subgraph of maximum degree at most $1$. Computing the dissociation number ${\rm diss}(G)$ of a given graph $G$, defined as the order of a maximum dissociation set in $G$, is algorithmically hard even when $G$ is restricted to be bipartite. Recently, Hosseinian and Butenko proposed a simple $\frac{4}{3}$-approximation algorithm for the dissociation number problem in bipartite graphs. Their result relies on the inequality ${\rm diss}(G)\leq\frac{4}{3}α(G-M)$ implicit in their work, where $G$ is a bipartite graph, $M$ is a maximum matching in $G$, and $α(G-M)$ denotes the independence number of $G-M$. We show that the pairs $(G,M)$ for which this inequality holds with equality can be recognized efficiently, and that a maximum dissociation set can be determined for them efficiently. The dissociation number of a graph $G$ satisfies $\max\{ α(G),2ν_s(G)\} \leq {\rm diss}(G)\leq α(G)+ν_s(G)\leq 2α(G)$, where $ν_s(G)$ denotes the induced matching number of $G$. We show that deciding whether ${\rm diss}(G)$ equals any of the four terms lower and upper bounding ${\rm diss}(G)$ is NP-hard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Relating the independence number and the dissociation number

The independence number $α(G)$ and the dissociation number ${\rm diss}(G)$ of a graph $G$ are the largest orders of induced subgraphs of $G$ of maximum degree at most $0$ and at most $1$, respectively. We consider possible improvements of the obvious inequality $2α(G)\geq {\rm diss}(G)$. For connected cubic graphs $G$ distinct from $K_4$, we show $5α(G)\geq 3{\rm diss}(G)$, and describe the rich and interesting structure of the extremal graphs in detail. For bipartite graphs, and, more generally, triangle-free graphs, we also obtain improvements. For subcubic graphs though, the inequality cannot be improved in general, and we characterize all extremal subcubic graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access