Researcher profile

Luca Rinaldi

Luca Rinaldi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

IMT to Satellite Stochastic Interference Modeling and Coexistence Analysis of Upper 6 GHz Band Service

The surging capacity demands of 5G networks and the limited coverage distance of high frequencies like millimeter wave (mmW) and sub-terahertz (THz) bands have led to consider the upper 6GHz (U6G) spectrum for radio access. However, due to the presence of the existing satellite (SAT) services in these bands, it is crucial to evaluate the impact of the interference of terrestrial U6G stations to SAT systems. A comprehensive study on the aggregated U6G-to-SAT interference is still missing in the literature. In this paper, we propose a stochastic model of interference (SMI) to evaluate the U6G-to-SAT interference, including the statistical characterization of array gain and clutter loss and considering different interference modes. Furthermore, we propose an approximate geometrical-based stochastic model of interference (GSMI) as an alternative method to SMI when the clutter-loss distribution is unavailable. Our results indicate that given the typical international mobile telecommunication (IMT) parameters, the aggregated interference power is well below the relevant protection criterion, and we prove numerically that the GSMI method overestimates the aggregated interference power with only 2dB compared to the SMI method.

preprint2022arXiv

Localizing the Vehicle's Antenna: an Open Problem in 6G Network Sensing

Millimeter Waves (mmW) and sub-THz frequencies are the candidate bands for the upcoming Sixth Generation (6G) of communication systems. The use of collimated beams at mmW/sub-THz to compensate for the increased path and penetration loss arises the need for a seamless Beam Management (BM), especially for high mobility scenarios such as the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) one. Recent research advances in Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) indicate that equipping the network infrastructure, e.g., the Base Station (BS), with either a stand-alone radar or sensing capabilities using optimized waveforms, represents the killer technology to facilitate the BM. However, radio sensing should accurately localize the Vehicular Equipment (VE)'s antenna, which is not guaranteed in general. Differently, employing side information from VE's onboard positioning sensors might overcome this limitation at the price of an increased control signaling between VE and BS. This paper provides a pragmatic comparison between radar-assisted and position-assisted BM for mmW V2I systems in a typical urban scenario in terms of BM training time and beamforming gain loss due to a wrong BM decision. Simulation results, supported by experimental evidence, show that the point target approximation of a traveling VE does not hold in practical V2I scenarios with radar-equipped BS. Therefore, the true antenna position has a residual uncertainty that is independent of radar's resolution and implies 50\,\% more BM training time on average. Moreover, there is not a winning technology for BM between BS-mounted radar and VE's onboard positioning systems. They provide complementary performance, depending on position, although outperforming blind BM techniques compared to conventional blind methods. Thus, we propose to optimally combine radar and positioning information in a multi-technology integrated BM solution.