BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Louisa Seelbach Benkner

Louisa Seelbach Benkner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsInformation Theorymath.COmath.ITDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Comparison of Empirical Tree Entropies

Whereas for strings, higher-order empirical entropy is the standard entropy measure, several different notions of empirical entropy for trees have been proposed in the past, notably label entropy, degree entropy, conditional versions of the latter two, and empirical entropy of trees (here, called label-shape entropy). In this paper, we carry out a systematic comparison of these entropy measures. We underpin our theoretical investigations by experimental results with real XML data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Entropy Bounds for Grammar-Based Tree Compressors

The definition of $k^{th}$-order empirical entropy of strings is extended to node labelled binary trees. A suitable binary encoding of tree straight-line programs (that have been used for grammar-based tree compression before) is shown to yield binary tree encodings of size bounded by the $k^{th}$-order empirical entropy plus some lower order terms. This generalizes recent results for grammar-based string compression to grammar-based tree compression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Collection of Fringe Subtrees in Random Binary Trees

A fringe subtree of a rooted tree is a subtree consisting of one of the nodes and all its descendants. In this paper, we are specifically interested in the number of non-isomorphic trees that appear in the collection of all fringe subtrees of a binary tree. This number is analysed under two different random models: uniformly random binary trees and random binary search trees. In the case of uniformly random binary trees, we show that the number of non-isomorphic fringe subtrees lies between $c_1n/\sqrt{\ln n}(1+o(1))$ and $c_2n/\sqrt{\ln n}(1+o(1))$ for two constants $c_1 \approx 1.0591261434$ and $c_2 \approx 1.0761505454$, both in expectation and with high probability, where $n$ denotes the size (number of leaves) of the uniformly random binary tree. A similar result is proven for random binary search trees, but the order of magnitude is $n/\ln n$ in this case. Our proof technique can also be used to strengthen known results on the number of distinct fringe subtrees (distinct in the sense of ordered trees). This quantity is of the same order of magnitude in both cases, but with slightly different constants in the upper and lower bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Practical Random Access to SLP-Compressed Texts

Grammar-based compression is a popular and powerful approach to compressing repetitive texts but until recently its relatively poor time-space trade-offs during real-life construction made it impractical for truly massive datasets such as genomic databases. In a recent paper (SPIRE 2019) we showed how simple pre-processing can dramatically improve those trade-offs, and in this paper we turn our attention to one of the features that make grammar-based compression so attractive: the possibility of supporting fast random access. This is an essential primitive in many algorithms that process grammar-compressed texts without decompressing them and so many theoretical bounds have been published about it, but experimentation has lagged behind. We give a new encoding of grammars that is about as small as the practical state of the art (Maruyama et al., SPIRE 2013) but with significantly faster queries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access