BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lorenzo Carlucci

Lorenzo Carlucci contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LOmath.COLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2017arXiv

A weak variant of Hindman's Theorem stronger than Hilbert's Theorem

Hirst investigated a slight variant of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem -- called Hilbert's Theorem -- and proved it equivalent over $\RCA_0$ to the Infinite Pigeonhole Principle for all colors. This gave the first example of a natural restriction of Hindman's Theorem provably much weaker than Hindman's Theorem itself. We here introduce another natural variant of Hindman's Theorem -- which we name the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem -- and prove it to be provable from Ramsey's Theorem for pairs and strictly stronger than Hirst's Hilbert's Theorem. The lower bound is obtained by a direct combinatorial implication from the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem to the Increasing Polarized Ramsey's Theorem for pairs introduced by Dzhafarov and Hirst. In the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem homogeneity is required only for finite sums of adjacent elements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman's Theorem

We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman's Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies $\mathsf{ACA}_0$. An emerging {\em leitmotiv} is that the known lower bounds for Hindman's Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

"Weak yet strong" restrictions of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem

We present a natural restriction of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem that admits a simple combinatorial proof (one that does not also prove the full Finite Sums Theorem) and low computability-theoretic and proof-theoretic upper bounds, yet implies the existence of the Turing Jump, thus realizing the only known lower bound for the full Finite Sums Theorem. This is the first example of this kind. In fact we isolate a rich family of similar restrictions of Hindman's Theorem with analogous properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The strength of Ramsey Theorem for coloring relatively large sets

We characterize the computational content and the proof-theoretic strength of a Ramsey-type theorem for bi-colorings of so-called {\em exactly large} sets. An {\it exactly large} set is a set $X\subset\Nat$ such that $\card(X)=\min(X)+1$. The theorem we analyze is as follows. For every infinite subset $M$ of $\Nat$, for every coloring $C$ of the exactly large subsets of $M$ in two colors, there exists and infinite subset $L$ of $M$ such that $C$ is constant on all exactly large subsets of $L$. This theorem is essentially due to Pudlàk and Rödl and independently to Farmaki. We prove that --- over Computable Mathematics --- this theorem is equivalent to closure under the $ω$ Turing jump (i.e., under arithmetical truth). Natural combinatorial theorems at this level of complexity are rare. Our results give a complete characterization of the theorem from the point of view of Computable Mathematics and of the Proof Theory of Arithmetic. This nicely extends the current knowledge about the strength of Ramsey Theorem. We also show that analogous results hold for a related principle based on the Regressive Ramsey Theorem. In addition we give a further characterization in terms of truth predicates over Peano Arithmetic. We conjecture that analogous results hold for larger ordinals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access