BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Livio Finos

Livio Finos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Procrustes-based distances for exploring between-matrices similarity

The statistical shape analysis called Procrustes analysis minimizes the distance between matrices by similarity transformations. The method returns a set of optimal orthogonal matrices, which project each matrix into a common space. This manuscript presents two types of distances derived from Procrustes analysis for exploring between-matrices similarity. The first one focuses on the residuals from the Procrustes analysis, i.e., the residual-based distance metric. In contrast, the second one exploits the fitted orthogonal matrices, i.e., the rotational-based distance metric. Thanks to these distances, similarity-based techniques such as the multidimensional scaling method can be applied to visualize and explore patterns and similarities among observations. The proposed distances result in being helpful in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analysis. The brain activation measured over space and time can be represented by a matrix. The proposed distances applied to a sample of subjects -- i.e., matrices -- revealed groups of individuals sharing patterns of neural brain activation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Resampling-Based Multisplit Inference for High-Dimensional Regression

We propose a novel resampling-based method to construct an asymptotically exact test for any subset of hypotheses on coefficients in high-dimensional linear regression. It can be embedded into any multiple testing procedure to make confidence statements on relevant predictor variables. The method constructs permutation test statistics for any individual hypothesis by means of repeated splits of the data and a variable selection technique; then it defines a test for any subset by suitably aggregating its variables' test statistics. The resulting procedure is extremely flexible, as it allows different selection techniques and several combining functions. We present it in two ways: an exact method and an approximate one, that requires less memory usage and shorter computation time, and can be scaled up to higher dimensions. We illustrate the performance of the method with simulations and the analysis of real gene expression data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust testing in generalized linear models by sign-flipping score contributions

Generalized linear models are often misspecified due to overdispersion, heteroscedasticity and ignored nuisance variables. Existing quasi-likelihood methods for testing in misspecified models often do not provide satisfactory type-I error rate control. We provide a novel semi-parametric test, based on sign-flipping individual score contributions. The tested parameter is allowed to be multi-dimensional and even high-dimensional. Our test is often robust against the mentioned forms of misspecification and provides better type-I error control than its competitors. When nuisance parameters are estimated, our basic test becomes conservative. We show how to take nuisance estimation into account to obtain an asymptotically exact test. Our proposed test is asymptotically equivalent to its parametric counterpart.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Enhancing statistical inference in psychological research via prospective and retrospective design analysis

In the past two decades, psychological science has experienced an unprecedented replicability crisis which uncovered several issues. Among others, statistical inference is too often viewed as an isolated procedure limited to the analysis of data that have already been collected. We build on and further develop an idea proposed by Gelman and Carlin (2014) termed "prospective and retrospective design analysis". Rather than focusing only on the statistical significance of a result and on the classical control of type I and type II errors, a comprehensive design analysis involves reasoning about what can be considered a plausible effect size. Furthermore, it introduces two relevant inferential risks: the exaggeration ratio or Type M error (i.e., the predictable average overestimation of an effect that emerges as statistically significant), and the sign error or Type S error (i.e., the risk that a statistically significant effect is estimated in the wrong direction). Another important aspect of design analysis is that it can be usefully carried out both in the planning phase of a study and for the evaluation of studies that have already been conducted, thus increasing researchers' awareness during all phases of a research project. We use a familiar example in psychology where the researcher is interested in analyzing the differences between two independent groups. We examine the case in which the plausible effect size is formalized as a single value, and propose a method in which uncertainty concerning the magnitude of the effect is formalized via probability distributions. Through several examples, we show that even though a design analysis requires big effort, it has the potential to contribute to planning more robust and replicable studies. Finally, future developments in the Bayesian framework are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access